Laserfiche WebLink
there were no decisions, just discussions and comments. <br />(3)During the "Public Meeting", All of these concerns about the salt content and bench material <br />as well as numerous other questions were addressed and neither the State nor WFC ever <br />responded to any of those. I even wrote and asked for the transcript of that meeting and to no <br />avail dial I receive one. <br />(4)As to signing the agreement for extra water shares, i nor M&M custom Farming which I am <br />the President leased WFC any shares of water and as I told their attorney, I did not have to sign <br />that agreement. I had Mr. Morgan, Mary Lou Morgan, and Michael sign the agreement since <br />they were the ones leasing their shares and bad nothing to do with. me. I did not fail to respond, I <br />dial not have to sign that agreement. Also, only 60 shares was recommended by NRCS and they <br />threw in the additional or whatever was needed to reclaim the property. It was not 107.96 acres, <br />it was 1.40 mot minus the 25 mol and it did not include just what was in the permit area because <br />the road that they put right through our prime fields will also have to be reclaimed to cropland . <br />That is why we used, including their attorney, what was actually destroyed and leased. <br />(5)This was would be calculated by the Morgans, not MRCS, l share of water will d42 acres of <br />land, always has, always will and if this system they are requiring steeds more water, it is there. <br />(6)The mine, according to Federal and State law must lease or provide by an "alternate water <br />supply the water necessary to reclaim any piece of land back to as good as or better than it was, at <br />the time of the lease. When Mr. Morgan told them that he had irrigated for 50 years with that 50 <br />shares, if they dial not feel that this was enough, they should have said so then, Not make it sound <br />like we didn't have enough water or that this could not be done. They make it sound like, Now <br />that the Morgans have agreed to lease more water they can return it to cropland. By law they <br />have to return it to cropland even if they have to use an alternate source to do it with and it is not <br />the Morgans responsibility to make sure. that happens. It was the mines to make sure they had. <br />enough and was able to return it to the condition it was prior to them. entering the property. If <br />they feel they are short of water, why is the state allowing them, to take 12 shares out of the <br />permit area and use it elsewhere? <br />(7)Calamity draw does not irrigate San Miguel. Powers Property another distortion of the truth <br />and false documentation. One of these days the State and the Federal Government will be able to <br />see all of these lies and you will wish that you had just told the truth and kept to the true facts. <br />(8)1 have hayed this place for 18 years, even before you were here and have lived here most of <br />my life and went to school, here. The Federal and State laws give me the right to object and file <br />suits as a citizen that is being adversely affected by the surface coal mine. I do not have to be a <br />land owner, or lease the property, or have a power of attorney for input on the reclamation or <br />mining practices on any piece of property. I am seeing the laws being broken and I am reading <br />documentation that is falsified and. all. of these documents of public record adversely affects me <br />and I have the right to fight until they are corrected and PR6 contains numerous pages of this type <br />of false documentation and because it is even happening today, it involves the State and Federal.