Laserfiche WebLink
Government and they should want ALL of the information to read correctly. All of this <br />documentation involves eye sores, land use application documents, permit applications, technical <br />revisions, permit renewals, land use descriptions, water use, and all of these things adversely <br />affects me when they contain lies. All of these people that you say have no complaints, is <br />another he. When we are given either a written warning or a verbal warning that we are not <br />allowed to file objections and given, written. warnings that you are suing or taping their royalties <br />away, and for them to keep their mouths closed that they are not allowed to file an objection„ <br />what do you expect from them.? There are dissatisfied people and some of them want to sit in on <br />this meeting with us, since we were denied. any future PUBLIC meeting. And we cannot resolve <br />600 pages of falsely documented materials with single meetings. <br />(9)Applying for permit applications and permit renewals and ,falsely giving information on those <br />applications when there is a spot for any Prime farmlands or alluvial.s within the permit and YOU <br />put NOT APPLICABLE, that is false documentation and the only thing that the State has to go <br />with or OSM is what you wrote and swore to be true and correct. And yes, .I did write several <br />objections to renewal of you{permit and yes I do have copies. Certified, return receipt. <br />(I O)A.ttached to TR57 was a letter from WFC stating that this tr57 would not affect our prime <br />farmland and. that everyone including the State and NRCS is in agreement that all of our land is <br />prime farmland and would be restored to cropland. When we wrote our withdrawal, we <br />SPECIFICALLY withdrew UNTIL WE COULD SEE THE ENTIRE PICTURE AND <br />RESERVED OUR RIGHT TO OBJECT AT A LATER. DATE. IT SAYS THAT! We also <br />asked if this was suppose to be a TECWC.A,L Revision and ALL of you told us o.. THIS <br />WAS ILLEGAL! A Year went by and then we were slapped, and I mean SLAPP with PR6 <br />and the letter stated that we would receive a revision governing our prime farmland within 30-45 <br />days. A YEAR went by and then all of you tried to change our, beautiful farm into dryland! r ! <br />(I I)TR57 as TR49 and others are illegal and I do not know how you correct those unless you <br />change those revisions to Permit Revisions and add for another public comment and objections <br />period which we did not get changing them with almost 300 pages and allowing only a 7 day <br />period for comments. <br />(12) You keep saying that proper public notices were given and I have a copy of All of those <br />public notices and for Permit Renewals you state that the permit renewal can be seen in Denver <br />or Gjct and that these are JUST to extend the amount of land to be included. WHY WOULD <br />WE OBJECT TO THAT TYPE OF PUBLIC NOTICE? It did not give us any information and <br />we were unable to read it because it was NOT at this court house! When we Med our objections <br />since we dial not have specifics, Marcia just threw there our the window, but they were filed! <br />(13)TR57. When Ross Gubka came to discuss the approval of TR57, he had a pen and pad and <br />asked us for our comments and objections and we went through it page by page and told him <br />what we objected to and we STILL have that original copy of our objections. He wrote them <br />down and said he would re-phrase those things we wanted changed and change the things we <br />asked to be change that he said he could do. ALL OF THOSE THINGS THAT WE ASKED TO <br />BE CHANGED ARE STILL PART OF TR57 and the FALSE docurnentation that he guaranteed