Laserfiche WebLink
b6 <br />AND PUT ON BUD BENSONS PLACE. They are indicating that the 21 inches is all that we <br />had and all that they salvaged. This is all a falsehood. They salvaged it and I called Dan <br />Mathews and asked them to quit removing our prime soils and after 3 days and 3 nights, it ceased <br />but then the state did not come up here and make them put it back. But, the amount removed <br />from this place and salvaged from this place should and is documented somewhere and they are <br />not going to make it look like that's all we had. All of our topsoil maps show the depth of our <br />soils up to 72 inches or better and shows they removed it from our place. They are not going to <br />keep saying that is all we had. <br />2.05.4(2)(d)-26 Prior to February 2008 they went to a ONE lift operation without permission <br />from us and we had no knowledge of this going to happen. HOW WAS THIS APPROVED? <br />They enter prime farmland. They were doing a two lift operation and then changed to a one lift <br />operation, how can the State ever allow anything like this? Some one needs to pay for the loss <br />of our topsoil. This was intentional. <br />2.05.4(2) (d)-27 The prime farmland soils were identified in 2008 LIES LIES LIES. In 1992, <br />1988, 1996, 1999, Barx soils are prime soils in the State of Colorado. <br />2.05.4(2)(d) Do not allow them to keep putting our soils in inches. A minimum of 48 inches or <br />to its natural depth. If it is there, put it back. <br />-28 Prime Farmland criteria is a MINIMUM of 48 inches or to its natural depth. <br />2.05.4(2)(d)-44 Replacement is not up to NRCS or to WFC. NRCS can give their opinion. We <br />were not allowed at that meeting and the law states a MINIMUM of 48 inches or TO IT's <br />NATURAL DEPTH. It was agreed if they remove it, they put it back. <br />2.05.4(2)(e)-1 Prime farmald soil was by NRCS in 2008. Lies Lies Lies 1988, 1992, 1996. <br />1999 1998 all classifed PRIME SOILS and stated that BARX is a prime soil in the State of <br />Colorado. <br />All lands should be put back as good as or better than they were. Protect the landowners rights as <br />the laws require. <br />Cropland, pastureland, rangeland. Those are the choice. Use the correct terminology and put it <br />back like it was. All of these places being mined would be classified simply as cropland and ours <br />would be classified as prime farmland. Prime farmland MUST be cropland but cropland does <br />not have to be prime. <br />2.05.4(2)(e)-2 All lands on the morgan property have been converted to irrigated cropland. The <br />lands on the Morgan property have not been converted to anything. The lands on the Morgan <br />property have been and still are CROPLAND. <br />"Irrigated hay pasture land irrigated grass" Who comes up with this stuff .9 It is simply cropland. <br />It was harvested for production and is still being harvested for production, it is cropland. And by