Laserfiche WebLink
direction, the tail water flows back to Huerfano River approximately rnid- <br />way to the cast, just short of the east section line of said Section 31. Please <br />see the revised Pre-Mining Map attached to this adequacy reply. This will <br />expedite the pennitting process since it is difficult. and time consuming at <br />this late date to get all the parties togher to settle on an agreement <br />concerning the Pino Ditch, however the operator will endeavor to get this <br />agreement in the future. <br />iv. The consultant representing the applicant erroneously stated that the <br />Colorado Interstate Gas Company (C.I.G.) had a gas transmission pipeline <br />running over this permit area. No gas pipeline is on this permit nor closer <br />than 200 feet. <br />3. The concerns articulated by the Division of Reclamation. Mining and Safety relating to the letter <br />sent by the Colorado Historical Society (SHPO). The applicant contacted the Shina duVall: <br />Shina duVall, RPA <br />Section 106 Compliance Manager <br />1560 Broadway, Suite 400 <br />Denver, CO 80202 <br />303-866-4674 (direct) <br />303-866-2711 (fax) <br />e-mail - shina.duvall(rl)chs.st:ite.co.us <br />The following e-mail was sent to Mr. Peter Hays of the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety: <br />From: duVall, Shina [mailto:Shina.duVall@chs.state.co.usI -Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:40 <br />AM-To: Hays, Peter-.Cc: JOSEPH GAGLIANO_Subject: RE: LEONE HUERFANO GRAVEL PIT <br />DRMS FILE M-2010-004 <br />Hi Peter, <br />We have spoken with Mr. Gagliano and identified the location and site boundaries for both their <br />proposed activities and the historic property that we mentioned in our initial response letter (5HF398). <br />Upon closer review of the project area and additional discussion with Mr. Gagliano, we are comfortable <br />that the proposed pit will not affect the site. <br />Please let me know if this email is sufficient, or if you prefer a hard copy letter stating this for your <br />files.