My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-12-21_REVISION - M1980244 (40)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2009-12-21_REVISION - M1980244 (40)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:24 PM
Creation date
12/30/2009 8:53:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/21/2009
Doc Name
QA Liner Recert- App.A, Phase IVc Cert. Doc.
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 2004 -34- 043 -2170 <br />testing of extrusion welded seams and repairs. Golder monitored and documented the non - destructive <br />testing. <br />Prior to pressure testing of fusion seams, Poly -Flex heat - sealed both ends of the air channel between <br />the two tracks of the double wedge weld. Poly -Flex then inserted a pressure gauge in one end of the <br />sealed channel. Poly -Flex pressurized the air channel to approximately 30 pounds per square inch <br />(psi) using an air pump. After pressure stabilization, Golder monitored the gauge for a minimum of <br />five minutes. The maximum allowable pressure drop was 3 psi. <br />Poly -Flex and Golder verified fusion seam continuity before heat - sealing both seam ends, completed <br />pressure testing, and with the gauge left in place, out the opposite end of the seam. If the gauge <br />pressure dropped to zero, the seam was determined to be continuous. In cases where the seam was <br />found to be discontinuous, the seam was subdivided into shorter sections until continuous seam <br />sections were located and passing pressure tests were performed, or the outer edge of the seam was <br />extrusion welded and vacuum tested. <br />If a pressure test failed, Poly -Flex checked the seam section for leakage, and repaired and re- tested <br />the seam. If Poly -Flex was unable to find the leak, the seam was divided into two sections, with each <br />section being tested to locate the area of concern. This subdivision process was repeated until the <br />leak location was identified. If the leak area was not located, Poly -Flex reconstructed the seam, and <br />then vacuum tested the repair. <br />Poly -Flex tested extrusion welded seam sections with a vacuum box. Prior to vacuum box testing, <br />Poly -Flex applied a soap and water solution to the seam section. The vacuum box was then placed <br />over the seam area and energized with a vacuum pump capable of creating a vacuum of not less than <br />5 psi. Poly -Flex and Golder observed the action of the vacuum on the seam for a minimum of ten <br />seconds. Each consecutively tested seam length was overlapped a minimum of 3 inches. If soap <br />bubbles appeared, Golder marked and documented the leak location. Poly -Flex then repaired the leak <br />and vacuum tested the repair. This procedure was also followed to test extrusion repairs and <br />extrusion patches. <br />The seam non - destructive test summaries (fusion pressure tests and extrusion vacuum tests) are <br />presented. in Appendix K -9. <br />• <br />1:%4%117WANUCe14)& lVc- 1004M3S170."OCLIZ &CerfhlVcdx Golder Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.