My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038A
>
2009-11-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:16 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:22:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/30/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
VOLUME 7 Exhibit 1 Deeds and Water Rights Paonia Loadout
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEETING MINUTES <br />Fire Mountain Canal/CWI <br />November 1, 1984, 1 p.m. <br />Representing Fire Mountain Canal: Charles Hallenbeck <br />Representiny CWI: Matt Sakurada and Jim Roberts <br />The meeting was held in order to answer any questions which arose after our <br />initial inform ational meeting with the Fire Mountain Canal Roard of ~irec- <br />turs. C, Hallenbeck stated that the Steven's Gulch diversion right would be <br />abandoned; but Terror Creek and Roatcap Creek rights are necessary, When in <br />ci:=umstances similar to last spriny, irrigation could continue below a <br />breach in the ditch bank and also those rights serve senior rights helow <br />Terror and Roatcap Creeks, permitting Fire Mountain Canal to use water from <br />the North Fork, <br />Matt explained that Lease C-37210 boundaries were designed to avoid any <br />undermining of Terror and Roatcap Creeks, and where these drainages were to <br />be undermined, overburden thickness values precluded any impact upon Fire <br />Mountain Canal's water rights. Hallenbeck questioned if CWI anticipated <br />using the Fire Mountain shares for replacement water. Matt informed him <br />that CWI will keep that water for orchard irrigation and not substitute Fire <br />Mountain shares for another water right. Charles said he did not have <br />further concern, but would like this information presented to the board. <br />Charles invited CWI to Fire Mountain Canal's November monthly meeting to <br />present these topics. <br />J VRr' yw <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.