My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-11-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038A
>
2009-11-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:16 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:22:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/30/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
VOLUME 7 Exhibit 1 Deeds and Water Rights Paonia Loadout
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I4EETING NOTES <br />FIRE MOUNTAIN CAtJAL AND COLORADO WESTMORELAND <br />November 8, 1984 <br />CWI Representatives: Matt Sakurada and Jim Rcberts <br />Fire Fountain Canal Representatives: Ben Sheldon, Charles Hallenbeck, Shirley <br />Smith, and Chuck Farmer <br />The meeting was held to further explain CWI's impact upon Fire Mountain Canal's <br />water rights. Matt explained that the two major streams (Terror Creek and West <br />Roatcap) would not be undermined and that only a small fraction of their drain- <br />age basins would be undermined. Also, in order to prevent subsidence from im- <br />pacting Steven's Gulch or East Roatcap Creek, solid portions of coal would be <br />left as buffer zones in areas of 500 ft. of overburden or less, with limited <br />access entryways driven through these with no pillar recovery. <br />In areas of 500 ft. or more overburden, CWI's consultants and governmental <br />officials expect no effects to water resources. This is due to rubblizing and <br />lack of resulting surface tensile stresses. Fire Mountain Canal plans to aban- <br />don the Steven's Gulch decree and is satisfied with the water protection mea- <br />sures outlined by CWI. No concerns or questions were voiced. <br />A discussion concerniny Fire Mountain Canal shares as potential water replace- <br />• ment sources followed. i4att informed the group that Fire Mountain Canal water <br />is committed to CWI's orchard and would not be used as a replacement source. <br />Charles asked what is needed from Fire Iountain Canal, since they have no prob- <br />lems with CWI's water replacement plan. Matt replied that the meetings are <br />documented and nothing else is necessary. <br />JVR/jw <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.