My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:13 PM
Creation date
2/23/2009 5:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/24/2008
Doc Name
Geotechnical Evaluation of Mine-Induced Seismicity on Bruce Park Dam, GEI Consultants, June 2002
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume X Bruce Park Dam Geotechnical Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Evaluation of Mine-Induced Earthquakes on Bruce Park°Dam <br />Bowie Resources, Limited <br />June 2002 <br />•) Consolidation stress at a specific depth in the dam was estimated by calculating mean <br />effective stress at that depth based on the overlying materials and the water pressure <br />conditions described in Section 3.5. Dynamic shear strength, which is what was used in the <br />analysis, was considered to be 80 percent of static shear strength to account for possible <br />degradation in strength due to cyclic loading. Selected material properties for each of the <br />four material types are presented in Table 3.1. <br />Maximum shear modulus for each material type was estimated using an empirical correlation <br />developed by Weiler (1988) that relates maximum shear modulus to overconsolidation ratio, <br />plasticity index, and undrained strength. As a result of shear strains caused by seismic <br />loading, the shear modulus of the soil decreases and the damping characteristics of now-less- <br />stiff soil increases. In the absence of laboratory data, we selected from typical modulus <br />reduction curves and damping curves available in SHAKE that in our opinion reasonably <br />represent the material types in the dam and foundation. The selected material parameters are <br />summarized in Table 3.2. <br />TABLE 3.1 <br />MATERIAL PROPERTIES USED IN THE PSEUDO-STATIC ANALYSIS <br />OF THE MAIN DAM <br />?J <br /> <br /> <br />Material Type Moist <br />Unit <br />Weight <br />c Saturated <br />Unit <br />Weight Soil <br />Layer <br />Number*(" Dynamic <br />Undrained <br />Strength <br />s <br />New Embankment 123 125 1 880 <br /> 2 880 <br /> 3 940 <br /> 4 1,140 <br /> 15 1,140 <br /> 16 1,140 <br /> 17 1,140 <br /> 18 1,140 <br />Old Embankment 118 122 13 1,470 <br /> 14 1,470 <br /> 5 1,490 <br /> 6 1,630 <br /> 7 1,780 <br /> 8 1,930 <br />Foundation Soils 126 126 9 1,770 <br /> 10 1,890 <br /> 11 2,010 <br /> 12 2,130 <br />Bedrock 133 139 19 11,200 <br />Notes: <br />(1) * - Refer to Figure 3.1 <br />,40 <br />02-05-22 Geotechnical Evaluation of dine-Induced Earthquakes <br />GEI Consultants, Inc. 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.