My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:13 PM
Creation date
2/23/2009 5:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/24/2008
Doc Name
Geotechnical Evaluation of Mine-Induced Seismicity on Bruce Park Dam, GEI Consultants, June 2002
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume X Bruce Park Dam Geotechnical Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Evaluation of Mine-Induced Earthquakes on Bruce Park Dam <br />Bowie Resources, Limited <br />June 2002 <br />identified as new embankment, old embankment, foundation soils (glacial deposits), and <br />bedrock as described in the aforementioned report. New embankment materials are <br />associated with an embankment raise completed in 1952 and old embankment materials are <br />associated with the original construction of the dam in 1940. The representative section had <br />a 16-foot-wide crest with 3H:1 V and ;.5H:1 V upstream and downstream slopes, <br />respectively. The representative section used in the pseudo-static analysis is presented on <br />Figure 3.1. <br />3.4 Representative Cross Section for SHAKE Analysis <br />We used a vertical section through the crest of the dam, which is consistent with a vertical <br />section through Figure 3.1 to develop the one-dimensional model for the SHAKE analysis. <br />The one-dimensional model used for the SHAKE analysis is shown on Figure 3.2. . <br />3.5 Water Pressures <br />Water pressures through the dam and foundation were estimated based on the following: <br />• full reservoir and steady state seepage with the reservoir at normal pool, which is 6 <br />feet below the crest of the dam <br />• the embankment is homogeneous and isotropic because it has no internal drainage <br />systems <br />• the phreatic surface would exit the downstream slope above the toe of the dam and <br />can be estimated using the Casagrande's solution (Casagrande, 1940) <br />It is our opinion that these assumptions are very conservative because seepage has not been <br />observed on the downstream slope and based on the typical operation of the reservoir, <br />saturation of the embankment is unlikely. <br />3.6 Material Properties <br />Material properties, such as moist and saturated unit weights, shear strengths, and maximum <br />shear moduli for different soil types were estimated based on: 1) results from laboratory tests <br />(GEI 2001), 2) published empirical correlations, and 3) our experience in geotechnical <br />engineering. <br />Static undrained shear strengths of new embankment, old embankment, and foundation soils <br />were based on undrained strength versus consolidation stress plots (Figures C.2, CA, and C.6 <br />from GEI, 2001), which are provided in Appendix A for reference. <br />11 <br />02-05-:: Geotechnical Evaluation of Mine-Induced Earthquakes <br />GEI Consultants, Inc. 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.