2008-12-04_PERMIT FILE - M2008070

• Permit No: M2008070
• IBM Index Class Name: PERMIT FILE
• Doc Date: 12/4/2008
• Doc Name: Preliminary adequacy review
• From: DRMS
• To: JSC, Inc.
• Email Name: GRM
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

6.4.4 - Exhibit D ,.Mining Plan
(a) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(b) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(c) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(d) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(e) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(f) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(g) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(h) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration
(i) Adequate, addressed through Mine Plan Narration.
Please clarify that no disturbances are planned in the Future Bridge and Access
Area.
Please clarify what disturbances and activities will occur in the Office / Scale
Area.
Please clarify what gas line protection requirements will be required by CIG.
6.4.5 - Exhibit E, Reclamation Plan
(1) Is adequate per plan narration. However staff recommends committing to a
range of topsoil placement of 4 to 8 inches with an average of 6 inches. This
allows some latitude in case there is less soil than anticipated or for minor
irregularities during reclamation work.
(a) Please include reclamation of the Office / Scale Area in reclamation plans.
(b) Is adequate per plan narration
(2)(c) Please refer to Rule 3.1.:
3.1.1 is adequately addressed.
3.1.2 is not applicable.
3.1.3: is adequately addressed.
3.1.4 is not applicable.
3.1.5: Materials Handling
(1) is adequate per reclamation plan narration
(2), is adequate per reclamation plan narration with the following clarification that
no highwalls will exist and mining will be done at a maximum 2:1 slope.
(3) is adequate per reclamation plan narration
(4) is adequate per reclamation plan narration
(5) not applicable
(6) not applicable
(7) is adequate per reclamation plan narration, mining at 2:1 and reclaimed to 3:1
slopes
(8) not applicable
(9) not applicable