My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-26_REVISION - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2008-06-26_REVISION - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:35 PM
Creation date
6/26/2008 3:21:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/26/2008
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR72
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
topographic sites, within each defined land use/vegetation community. Because <br />of the wide disparity regarding available topsoil volume between the post 2008 <br />"original permit area" reclamation units (8" over-all average replacement <br />thickness) and the South Taylor Area reclamation units (19.8" over-all average <br />replacement thickness), it will be necessary to present, in effect, two separate <br />plans, one for the original permit area units and one for the South Taylor units. <br />The plans would be similar in concept but would differ in specifics, and might <br />best be presented in two tables, one for South Taylor and one for Original Permit <br />Area. Land use/vegetation type categories within each table would logically <br />include Grazingland, Sagebrush Steppe, and Aspen/Chokecherry (possibly limited <br />to South Taylor). Topographic site categories would logically be defined by slope <br />position (e.g. ridges and upper slopes, mid slopes, and toe-slopes/drainage <br />bottoms). Favorable aspect as well as slope position would be an important <br />consideration for thick soil placement areas appropriate for aspen/chokecherry <br />conducive sites (which likely would be limited to north aspects and drainages in <br />the South Taylor area). The extent of variation that can be achieved in the <br />original permit area will be somewhat limited, due to the limited soil resource <br />available. More dramatic variation will be achievable (and will need to be <br />reflected in the plan) in the South Taylor Area, where the projected average soil <br />thickness is approximately 2.5 times greater. <br />Please provide a detailed topsoil replacement plan with commitments, in <br />accordance with the above recommendations. <br />4. The Division had requested inclusion of a special handling strategy for use of <br />sandstone or scoria overburden materials, as an additional shrub <br />establishment/diversity enhancement measure. The operator declined to include <br />the requested modification. Because it is likely that a well defined plan <br />committing to significant variation in topsoil replacement thickness will <br />accomplish sufficient substrate variability across the landscape, the Division will <br />not require special handling of select overburden material at this time. Pending <br />submittal of an acceptable soil replacement plan as requested in Item 4, the <br />Division will consider this Item Resolved. <br />Revegetation [(2.05.4(2)(e) and 4.151 <br />Supplemental Introduction in amended Section 2.05.4 <br />5. The Division had requested the operator to revise their initially proposed woody <br />plant density standards to conform with the following: <br />• A standard of at least 500 live woody plant stems per acre and at least 250 live big <br />sagebrush plants per acre will apply on "Sagebrush Steppe/Wildlife Habitat <br />Targeted Areas", and such areas will comprise a minimum 20% of the acreage of <br />post-2008 reclamation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.