My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (268)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (268)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:10 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 3:16:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
County Vol 1 Attachment 5
From
CC & V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company MLE Traffic Impact Study <br />average rate of 28 trucks per day and an estimated maximum potential of 50 trucks per <br />day). <br />Right now, deliveries to the Ironclad access (an actual count of 14 trucks per day) are <br />almost to the estimated maximum potential level (projected maximum of 17 trucks per <br />day) while the deliveries to the Carlton access (an actual count of 20 trucks per day) are <br />under the estimated average rate (23 trucks per day) and well under the projected <br />maximum of 33 trucks per day. <br />Other Mine Traffic <br />Some of the traffic that has been associated with mining operations in the past does not <br />currently exist. Mobilization and construction traffic associated with mining expansion is <br />one example. Currently, there are no construction or expansion activities, so this traffic <br />does not exist at the present time. However there will be some additional traffic <br />associated with the construction of the Phase 5 VLF in Arequa Gulch. That traffic will <br />only be temporary traffic, however, and will not be a part of the normal everyday traffic <br />once that facility is built. <br />IMPACTS OF MINE-RELATED TRAFFIC ON ROADWAY <br />FACII ITIES <br />Existing Peak Hour Turning Movement Traffic <br />Fourteen-hour turning movement counts at the Carlton and Ironclad mine accesses were <br />taken in October 2007. From this information, the AM and PM peak hour turning <br />movement traffic volumes were calculated. Figure 3 shows the Year 2007 AM and PM <br />peak hour turning movement volumes at the Carlton and Ironclad mine access points. <br />tll <br />d <br />U <br />Q <br />z 8 (0)18 (0~ CRBd <br />m <br />V 33 (1) / 15 (0) <br />1 ~\\ <br />4 (1) / 18 (0) 3 (0) 114 (0) 0 9 (e) 113 (o) <br />Q ~ ~ 5 (0) I 1 (0) <br />J ~ <br />U <br />SH 67 0 16 (0)127 (1) 6 (O) I 1 (0) <br />4 (4) 11 (o) J ~4 (0) / 2 (0) <br />18 (1)152 (0)-' '-39 (1)153 (0) <br />xx xz) =All Traffic, AM Peak (Truck Traffic), AM Peak I All Traffic, PM Peak (Truck Traffic), PM Peak <br />N'igure 3 -Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes, Carlton <br />and Ironclad access points <br />In order to analyze the operational impacts of the existing mine traffic, peak hour turning <br />movement traffic at the Ironclad and Carlton entrances was counted and analyzed <br />according to the methods and procedures of the Year 2000 Him v Capacity Manual <br />(HCM) as applied in the Highway Capacity Software. <br />• <br />Interstate Engineering, Inc. 7 April, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.