My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-06-13_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
1986-06-13_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2020 6:58:41 AM
Creation date
6/5/2008 3:23:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/13/1986
Doc Name
Permit Application Approval Package Fed Leases C-023703, D-047201, C-8424, C-8425, C-0126669
From
OSM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L\r Or M IN REPLY REFER TO <br /> United States Department of the Interior <br /> 's C-023703 <br /> ' BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT D-047201 <br /> • �, CRAIC DISTRICT OFFICE <br /> 455 EMERSON STREET <br /> P.O.BOX 248 <br /> CRAIC,COLORADO 81626 <br /> July 16, 1985 <br /> Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br /> 423 Centennial Building <br /> 1313 Sherman Street I <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Attention: Greg Squire <br /> Dear Mr. Squire: <br /> Additional requested information pertaining to the technical revision <br /> request by Western Fuels Association, Inc., for the reorientation of their <br /> original mine plan was received and reviewed by this office. The <br /> information submitted by Western Fuels Association Inc. was found to be <br /> complete and described the problem in great detail enabling us to approve <br /> the technical revision of the Resource Recovery and Protection Plan <br /> (R2P2). Additional comments and recommendations are as follows: <br /> 1 . ) The proposed reorientation will result in the loss of approximately <br /> 1 ,734,000 tons of coal , or 7 percent less coal than originally <br /> projected. However, this is justified by the fact that considerably <br /> more coal would probably be lost if the mine was not reorientated. <br /> In addition the reorientation will reduce the possibility of injury <br /> or loss of life of mine workers at the Deserado Mine. For example, a <br /> tremendous amount of coal could be lost if a section of pillars <br /> failed due to continual spalling caused by the coal cleat. This <br /> example _is just', one possibility of several potential problems. <br /> Consideration was, also given to the cost of timbering sections of the <br /> mine where the problem exists. The conclusion was reached that this <br /> alternative would` make the coal uneconomical to mine because of the <br /> large cost that would be incurred due to the large area affected by <br /> CONSERVE <br /> AMERICA'S <br /> ENERGY <br /> Save Energy and You Serve America. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.