My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:13 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 1:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/14/2008
Doc Name
2007 Annual Hydrology Report to Appendix A
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2007
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
until mining reached this area the last few years. The recent higher TDS values are likely caused by <br />'ent .The overall TDS concentrations in well GC-1 had declined for the last few <br />the upgradz mining <br />years and the 2007 values show similar levels. The 2006 and 200? monitoring indicates the 2005 <br />increases were not representative of Large portions of the aquifer in this area. TDS concentrations in <br />HI aquifer well GP-3, further downgradient of well GMP-l, have overall been steady for the period <br />of observation. TDS concentrations in eastern wells have varied, showing that TDS varies naturally <br />over a large range in this aquifer. Fluctuations observed m wells GC-1 and GP-7 except for the last <br />few years mgt be natura,t due to their location. <br />Figure B-6 presents the TDS for 3rd White Sandstone wells GC-2, GP-9 and P-8. <br />Concentrations in each of these wells have been fairly steady for the last few years with a gradual <br />decline in well GC-2. The TDS for the last ten years for well P-8 shows fairly steady <br />concentrations after a large increase over the previous three years to a value of approximately 4000 <br />ve the levels a for the 3rd White Sandstone and is <br />mgll. The increase in well P-8 zs abo xpected <br />likely due to the upgradient mining based on the timing and magnitude of the increase. However, <br />some of this higher level could be natural based on natural large concentrations observed in 2nd <br />White Sandstone well P-5. Concentrations are expected to decline in the fitture if the increase is <br />due to upgradient mining. <br />Figure B-6 also presents TDS values for 2nd White Sandstone well P-5 and shows that the <br />concentration were in the 2500 to 3000 mg/1 range prior to mining in this area Water quality for <br />this well has nat been collected due to it being dry or nearly dry. Natural water-quality <br />concentrations in the lst, 2nd and 3rd White Sandstones are expected to vary over a similar range. <br />Figure B-7 presents the TDS concentrations versus time for alluvial wells GC-3, P-1, J-I <br />and COY. Lewis Shale -well P-3 is also included in this plot due to its response to the Pyeatt <br />Trapper Mining Company 3-3 <br />2007 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.