My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (39)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (39)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 12:37:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/22/2008
Doc Name
PDEIS Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTERFOUR Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />The applicant would construct a primary substation at the end of the alignment, as described in <br />Section 2.10.4. This area is under the jurisdiction of Mesa County and is currently zoned <br />Agricultural, Forestry, Transitional District (AFT). <br />Two or three secondary substations would be located around the mine site as necessary to <br />provide electrical power to the mine facilities as described previously. Land use impacts from <br />the secondary substations are the same as the mine and facilities section. <br />The transmission line crosses BLM-administered lands and private lands under the jurisdiction of <br />Mesa County. Compliance with these land use plans is addressed in the Railroad section. <br />Temporary Impacts <br />Temporary land use impacts will result from construction of the access roads, conveyor belt, <br />material storage sites, railroad corridor, and construction lay-down areas. Temporary impacts <br />would result from equipment and topsoil storage areas and temporary access roads. <br />Construction activities of the railroad include cut-and-fill, compaction, and track laying along the <br />railroad corridor. <br />Construction of the water pipeline and use of material storage sites and construction lay-down <br />areas would result in temporary impacts to wildlife habitat, livestock grazing, and agricultural <br />lands along the pipeline corridor. After reclamation and revegetation, wildlife habitat, livestock <br />forage, and agricultural productivity should return to normal within approximately two growing <br />seasons. <br />Permanent Impacts <br />Long-term impacts to land use would result from the aboveground facilities associated with the <br />mine; surface facilities would displace livestock grazing, recreation, and wildlife use from the <br />immediate area for the life of the project. Upon decommissioning of the mine, surface facilities <br />would be removed and the land would be restored to its original vegetative cover per BLM <br />policy. <br />Permanent impacts to land use would arise from construction of benches for the mine facilities <br />and the waste rock disposal area. Cuts and fills associated with construction of the loadout area <br />would also permanently impact land use. Up to 90-foot deep cuts are projected for the loadout <br />area. The coal waste disposal area is approximately 190 acres. These areas would be <br />permanently converted from the existing land use to energy development. <br />The long-term impacts to land use would be the operation of a linear utility corridor for the life <br />of the project. Land use along the railroad and pipeline corridor would be converted to a utility <br />ROW. Construction of the railroad would result in loss of agricultural lands, livestock grazing, <br />recreation, and wildlife habitat along the railroad corridor for the life of the project. This may <br />also result in permanent alteration of trails and lack of recreational access along the railroad and <br />pipeline corridor. <br />Construction of the railroad would result in long-term impacts to transportation corridors. The <br />trains would cross public roads in three locations. CAM proposes agrade-separated crossing <br />with State Highway (SH) 139, and at-grade crossings for CR 10 and CR M8. <br />Permanent impacts to land use would result from construction of the railroad corridor. As <br />previously discussed in Chapter 2, to improve the sight distance at the CR 10 crossing, CR 10 <br />4-5 <br />DBMS 560 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.