My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2008-03-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:53 PM
Creation date
3/4/2008 2:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/3/2008
Doc Name
Comment Letter
From
Joellen Turner
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
land in better or as good as condition as when they entered that piece of property. We also have <br />the right to farm that ground right behind the mining and keep our production. When we gave <br />that property to them, there was 30 years of rock picking, leveling, cultipacking, disking, <br />fertilizing, and harvesting done. There wasn't a rock in the soil. It was one of the prettiest fields <br />in the country. This is my personal feelings. I worked for the mine for 13 years and I am no <br />longer there because of a dispute between me and Ross. The mine has lawyers on standby 24-7. <br />They know they legally have to honor the contact in hand and let us fence(which they are <br />presently in default) ,farm, irrigate and harvest that property. We spent years of hard labor <br />getting it to where it was. If they can convince you that they do not have the water available to <br />reclaim it to row crops or alfalfa, then they could classify it as "Improved Pasture" which means <br />no fazming, little irrigating, one time fertilizing, and no harvesting, then they don't have to allow <br />us to do anything because they found sloop-hole. They also feel they spend way too much <br />money on reclamation which they think all of the farmers are getting this free stuff, but the <br />property was in that shape when they entered it. Now as to the water. Ross said that Mike <br />Boulay said that I said 1 shaze of water will do 1 acre of ground. This is an absolute untrue <br />statement. When Mike and I talked with Mike Boulay prior to your meeting, We specifically <br />told him that 1 share of water would do 2 not 1 but 2 acres of ground. I told Mike Boulay that <br />Ross said that 1 shaze would do 1 acre and I told Mike Boulay that this was not true and that we <br />had irrigated this property for all of these yeazs and 1 shaze will dot acres of ground. These were <br />the things we were really worried about. Now I will give you the calculations that will <br />mathematically back what I am trying to say. <br />There are 86,400 Seconds in a day. Times 7.5(gallons per cubic feet). This equals 648,000 <br />gallons per second feet per day. The number of gallons of water in 1 acre inch equals 27,000 <br />divided by 4 to get to Ross' 1/4 or .25 of an inch per day (this is for evaporation and <br />transpiration) equals 6750 gallons per 1/4 inch on ONE acre. 648,000 gallons per second foot <br />per day divided by 6750 gallons per quazter inch an acre equals 96 acres per second foot. 48.75 <br />shazes is approximately 1.5 second feet with a full head of water in the ditch. 1.5 second feet <br />times the 96 acres per second feet equals 144 acres that can be irrigated with 1.5 second feet. <br />Side rolls aze 70 % efficient which times the 144 acres come to 100.8 acres that can be irrigated <br />very conservatively with 50 shazes of water which Morgans' have already agreed to lease to the <br />Mine. There is approximately 105 acres to be reclaimed minus roads, ponds, etc. Ross' figures <br />aze incorrect and with 50 yeazs experience and also the last 17 yeazs of actually using 50 shazes to <br />make the production that we have should count..We aze the only ones in this entire asre that got <br />4 cuttings of hay this yeaz. <br />Western Fuels have made many mistakes in the past by actually doing too good of a job on some <br />of the azeas east of 2700 road which I myself planted, tilled, irrigated, etc. These areas they <br />should have already gotten bond release. Plans were wrong, crops should have been able to be <br />worked back up and replanted and there should never be a set 10 yeaz period to get your best <br />production. Western fuels did everything above and beyond the call of duty as I did to make <br />production and get bond release, which still hasn't happened. If everyone had actually talked <br />with the farmer and listened from day ONE, bond release would have happened yeazs ago. Now <br />Western Fuels is trying to cut corners. Their reclamation is such a very small amount of money <br />for them compared to any other aspect of the mine, but there's that dime. We don't want to be <br />shortchanged. We don't want shortcuts taken now that they have gotten to the very best farmland <br />in all of the country. This is the only farm in all that has been reclaimed that is actual prime farm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.