Laserfiche WebLink
Bowie No. 2 Mine,pg.2 <br /> Annual impoundment re-certifications were complete for all impoundments (sediment ponds). <br /> The SPCC plan is on file and certified in 2005. <br /> The coal waste pile certifications and quarterly inspections were current. BRL anticipates the <br /> coal waste pile will reach the approved design capacity during the spring of 2008. A new coal <br /> waste disposal facility is being permitted south of old State Hwy. 133. The approved cover depth <br /> for the current pile is 3 feet of rooting media and 1 foot of topsoil; and the approved final slopes <br /> will be 5:1. Contemporaneous grading and reclamation is current, and surface water runoff was <br /> not a problem during the inspection. The final grading, compaction, and soil cover needs to be <br /> completed and seeded/mulched/stabilized when the pile is completed in 2008. <br /> The air quality permit was current. Personal liability insurance was current through May 31, <br /> 2007. The current bond amount is $ 8,948,517.00 and we briefly reviewed a comprehensive BRL <br /> bond release tracking document showing bonding amounts for both mines (Mine No. 1 also). <br /> The 2007 AHR is dated April 13, 2007, and contains the required information. Subsidence <br /> monitoring and disturbed acreage data is included in the 2007 Annual Reclamation Report. <br /> Inspection participants indicated there has been no reported subsidence damage above <br /> underground mine workings. Mining will not be authorized within one mile of the Terror Creek <br /> Reservoir, pending completion of the requirements in permit stipulation no. 9, and approval by <br /> DRMS. <br /> This concluded our office records review, and summarizes our discussions on the current status <br /> of permit conditions held at the conclusion of the inspection. <br /> We conducted a field inspection of the disturbed areas, and focused on surface water runoff <br /> control into the sediment ponds. Surface water runoff control appeared to be working as <br /> designed and we did not identify any problems. Sediment pond embankments and spillways were <br /> somewhat snow covered and any water was frozen, but they appeared to be functioning as <br /> designed. <br /> We began uphill from the main office and facilities area, and made inspection stops and <br /> observations progressing downhill, and through the railroad loadout facility. We began at the <br /> upper fan bench where surface water runoff was not a problem, and the immediate surrounding <br /> slopes appear stable. One problematic landslide area on a cut slope is being monitored and <br /> probably will require additional mitigation. The main office / facilities pad / shop area and coal <br /> stockpile areas were well organized and maintained and all ditches observed were stable and <br /> functioning. <br />