My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP35645
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP35645
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:12:58 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:11:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
APPENDIX 1-B TO BLUE RIBBON COAL COMPANY TR REQUEST MINE BENCH STABILIZATION
Permit Index Doc Type
STABILITY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ analysis. The program is capable of analyzing stability <br />conditions for circular and randomly specified shear surfaces. <br />1 _ <br />Six sections were evaluated to determine appropriate design <br />I conditions. The first three sections were utilized to evaluate <br />general design alternatives. These included the following basic <br />- conditions: <br />' o Excavated foundation at toe of bench. <br />o Underground coal waste constructed at a slope of 25 degrees <br />from the toe of the slope to within 4 feet of the top of the <br />slope. <br />_ o Berm constructed on lower portions of bench fill. <br />' o Four-foot depth of recompacted fill material placed over <br />coal waste. <br />o Rock fill at toe area. <br />The conditions which were varied for the alternatives included <br />' the type of material utilized in the foundation toe area and <br />within the berm, and the height and width of the berm. The types <br />. of material evaluated included select sands and gravels, coal <br />waste and recompacted bench fill and colluvium. Results of these <br />evaluations are presented in Figures 6 and 7, Section CC <br />alternatives 1, 2 and 3. Based on the evaluation and on economic <br />considerations, the alternative 3 was selected for further <br />. evaluation. This alternative included: <br />o Excavated and recompacted foundation area at the toe of the <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.