My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP32708
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP32708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:49 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:19:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/22/2006
Doc Name
2005 Annual Hydrology Report
From
HydroGeo Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drafr West Elk Mine 2005 Annual Hydrology Report 37 <br />°~ „ ~ ~ ~ ;say ~ d ~ . ers° ==- <br />Beater than~Yhat~,prkes~rtted stn tie _CI,7PS~epotts $ase~d oq"itldts~valuecthb flow welghted;maxtmt)pl <br />annualf~a~litixty'(~DS~Joad~f>•om#the,Prodecf~was,,,1,176'tons a3rhtsalso~repie~elatsabouC=dp~tcentgf <br />~. .,~ <br />tide valueti_sed.tllthe,CHI,S. A~summary°ofithe satiniyy'Jpadirg"frbtnthe~'rolechcompaced~to,ifhe <br />GHIS shrdys shown oil Table"1:1 <br />Table 11 <br />Summary of Salinity Loading in the North Fork of the Gunnison <br /> Average Maximum Flow Calculated <br />Scenario Continuous Weighted TDS Annual Salinity Percent of <br /> Discharge Rate Concentration Loading CHIS Loading <br /> m m tons/ ear <br />WY 2005 t'~ 330 2,107 2,069 6.8% <br />WS'':2005P <br />2003 CHIS t ~ 5,520 2,500 30,159 - - <br />°~ using wrs vommes <br />lz~ Usipg Getieral'Mine Water Balance~ESlmafes <br />fin) Based on maximum permitted discharge rate <br />No, mining'nduced impacts, to' water quality, oi, flows m tFle'North Fork€ are _anticpated in' Wk' <br />2006???2 because mine discharges are not expected to increase and the dischazge water quality is <br />expected to remain the same. <br />5.2 Springs and Seeps <br />MCC routinely monitors 28 springs and seeps, listed in Table 3. Hydrographs of spring and seep <br />flows are presented in Appendix D and the flow and water quality data are in Appendix E. <br />5.2.1 Impacts to Water Quantity and Quality <br />Spring and seep flows in WY 2005 continued to be below normal compared to historical averages, <br />but were above flows from the previous years of draught. More springs were wet or flowing in <br />WY 2005 than in WY 2004. (Appendix D). Springs that were flowing in WY 2005 but not in WY <br />2004 include Spring G-3S, Spring G-26A, Spring 15-1, Spring 10-1, Spring 10-2, and Spring 11-2. <br />Seep E-14-1 has been dry for over two years. Two springs (Spring G-lA and Spring G-30) did not <br />flow but were wet in the spring season in WY 2005. These springs apparently have been affected <br />by the wetter climatic conditions occurring in WY 2005. There is no indication that of any changes <br />to spring or seep flows as a result of mining activities. <br />Water quality data from WY 2005 did not indicate changes from baseline conditions for most of <br />• the monitored springs. However the following springs had slightly elevated TDS and\or <br />conductivity values that were also noted in WY2004. Spring 27-1 had a slightly elevated <br />September 2006 HydroGeo, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.