My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP32708
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP32708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:49 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:19:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/22/2006
Doc Name
2005 Annual Hydrology Report
From
HydroGeo Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft West Elk Mine 2005 Annual Hydrology Report 38 <br />conductivity of 577 µmhos/cm compared to the maximum baseline value of 437 µmhos/cm and <br />` TDS of 350 mg/1 compared to the maximum baseline value of 300 mg/l. Spring G-7 had a slightly <br />elevated conductivity of 464 µmhos/cm compared to the maximum baseline value of 414 <br />µmhos/cm and TDS of 290 mg/I compared to the maximum baseline value of 230 mg/1. Spring G- <br />24 had a slightly elevated conductivity of 828 µmhos/cm compared to the maximum baseline value <br />of 564 µmhos/cm. Spring G-14 had a slightly elevated conductivity of 1,100 µmhos/cm compared <br />to the maximum baseline value of 682 µmhos/cm. Spring G-22 had a slightly elevated <br />conductivity of 1,250 µmhos/cm compared to the maximum baseline value of 640 µmhos/cm and <br />TDS of 770 mg/1 compared to the maximum baseline value of 516 mg/1. Spring LS-1 had a slightly <br />elevated conductivity of 1.430 µmhos/cm compared to the maximum baseline value of 1.120 <br />µmhos/cm and TDS of 940 mg/1 compared to the maximum baseline value of 730 mg/l. These <br />increased concentrations are most likely due to low flow rates during the sampling period in June <br />2004 and 2005 and are not believed to be related to mining operations. MCC will monitor the <br />water quality of these springs to see if any water quality trends occur. No mining-induced impacts <br />to water quality or flows in the monitored springs are anticipated in WY 2006. <br />5.3 Impacts to Stock Pouds and USFS Water Resources <br />Numerous stock ponds and USFS water resources are located in the Project area. The USFS water <br />resource sites are summarized in Table 7 and shown in Map 3. There was no known water loss or <br />mining related water quality issues at any of these locations in WY 2005. <br />5.4 Ground Water <br />MCC maintains a network of 28 ground water monitoring wells throughout the permit and lease <br />areas. Four existing monitoring wells were added to the monitoring program in WY 2005: wells <br />23-H-1, 23-H-2, 23-H-3, and 23-H-4. Baseline data for these wells were collected in WY 2005. A <br />summary of the ground water well monitoring schedule is presented in Table 4 and the well <br />completion data is presented in Table 5. The locations of the ground water monitoring wells are <br />shown on Map 2. The well water elevation and depth to water data aze presented in Appendix F <br />and the ground water quality data are presented in Appendix G. <br />The casings in several monitoring wells have collapsed in the past several years and are likely the <br />result of mining-induced subsidence. These wells include SOM-45-H1 (Sept. 2002), SOM-2-H <br />(Jul. 1999), SOM-16-H (Sep. 2000), 96-27-1 (Apr. 2002), and SO.W-1 (Jun. 2002). As a result, <br />. hydrologic data from these wells for WY 2005 are not available. <br />September 2006 HydroGeo, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.