Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />RULE 2.41(2): LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF ACRES RECLAIMED FOR <br />THAT YEAR. <br />No land was reclaimed during the last year. However, <br />some backfilling continued. Of course, the removal of the <br />sand dike can be considered to be a kind of reclamation. It <br />is opening to the south what was formerly a hole in the <br />ground. This turns land that had very limited utility into <br />a greater usefulness. <br />RULE 2.41(3): THE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF ACRES IN THE <br />VARIOUS STAGES OF RECLAMATION (BACKFILLED, GRADED, TOPSOIL <br />REPLACED, REVEGETATED). <br />The amount of land under reclamation continues at about <br />6.5 acres, not including the about S acres of mining that <br />could be considered a form of reclamation through grading. <br />The problem noted last year with runoff from the shopping <br />center to the north of the site seems to have been resolved. <br />Castle Concrete encouraged the owners of the shopping center <br />to change the roof drainage to the north side of the <br />shopping center and away from the pit slopes. A new curb <br />was also placed along the south boundary of the shopping <br />center. These welcome actions by the shopping center owners <br />appears to have Significantly reduced the flow over the <br />slope above the ditch. This greatly reduces the possibility <br />of slope erosion. <br />RULE 2.41(4): THE SPECIES OF VEGETATION PLANTED, THE <br />LOCATIONS AND APPROXIMATE DATES OF PLANTING. <br />No planting was done in the last year. <br />RULE 2.41(5): THE TYPE AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITY OF <br />FERTILIZERS, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR SOIL CONDITIONERS USED AND <br />LOCATION OF USE. <br />used. <br />Because no planting was done, no soil amendments were <br />Page 2 of 3 1989-1990 SAND PIT AMl~1L REPORT <br />