Laserfiche WebLink
1996 Annual Hyctrololry Report Respnnres <br />13ecemhar 11, 1997 <br />Pale h <br />field fur these springs and were provided nn the tables in Appendix F. Flease <br />note that data on these springs was being collected under the baseline <br />monitoring schedule, as they are new springs. MCC"s baseline monitoring <br />program is in the permit on pages'..t)~I-69, 7(l, and 71. <br />+The tab did not complete the analyses of conductivity, pH, and total <br />suspended solids for CR-12, as specited on MCC's standard list of parameters. <br />However. conductivity and pEi maastnements were collected in tfie field for <br />this spring and were provided on the table in Appendix F. <br />•The lab did not complete the analyses ofconduetivity, dissolved iron, pl I, and <br />total suspended solids for I5-?, as specified on MCC's standard list of <br />par.3trreters. Hmvever, conductivity and pH measurements were collected in the <br />Tield for this spring and were included on the table in Appendix F. Please note <br />that data on this spring was being collected under the baseline monitoring <br />schedule, as ii is a new spring. Please see MCC's baseline monitoring schedule <br />contained within the permit. <br />•The lab did not complete the analyses of conductivity, dissolved iron, and pH <br />for J-~I, as specified nn MCC's standard list of parameters. However, <br />conductivity and pH measurements were collected in the field for this spring <br />and were included nn the table in Appendix F. Please note that data an this <br />spring was being collected under the baseline monitoring schedule, as it is a <br />spring reinstated liom the early monitoring program. <br />MCC has had numerous discussions with the lab and cannot explain why they <br />missed a few parameters on a few spring sites. MCC. would like the Division <br />to reconsider the issuance of the violation as missing a few parantaters <br />(',particularly when two of them that are collected in the field era duplicated by <br />the lab:f does not impact the overall effectiveness of the spring monitoring <br />program. <br />16. •MCC did miss the third quarter sample for GP-3, which includes field <br />parameters. However, sinee 1985 there has never been any water in this wall to <br />sample or to collect field parameters on, so it can be assumed that the third <br />sampling period of 1446 would not yield any new data (see Table T-3}. Data <br />collected on this well during the 1947 Water Year continue to indicate that the <br />well is dry. <br />•Annual water quality analyses were not performed for SOM-13 because there <br />was not enough water to obtain a sample. <br />