My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP18128
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP18128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:47:03 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:19:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973007SG
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/12/1989
Doc Name
111 112 ENCLOSURE
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />REVEGETATED: As was reported last year, about 3 acres <br />has been placed in a revegetation status. This land is west <br />of Academy and is the area labeled as being "reseeded", as <br />shown on last year's map. No other land has actually been <br />placed in final revegetation because no other land is <br />available for final revegetation treatment. <br />RULE 2.41(4): THE SPECIES OF VEGETATION PLANTED, THE <br />LOCATIONS AND APPROXIMATE DATES OF PLANTING. <br />No planting was done last year. Please refer to the <br />1986-1987 annual report for a description of what was <br />planted on the area which was reseeded. <br />RULE 2.41(5): THE TYPE AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITY OF <br />FERTILIZERS, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR SOIL CONDITIONERS USED AND <br />LOCATION OF USE. <br />No fertilizers or soil amendments were applied as no <br />seeding occurred. No additional fertilizers or soil <br />amendments were added to areas which were previously seeded. <br />These areas are doing well without the benefit of such <br />materials. <br />RULE 2.41(6): AN APPRAISAL OF THE SUCCESS OF RECLAMATION <br />EFFORTS, AND IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE OF ANY EFFORTS, A SHORT <br />NARRATIVE ON THE SUSPECTED OR DETERMINED CAUSE OF SUCH <br />FAILURE. <br />Former revegetation efforts mainly involved the small <br />area near the entrance to the operation as well as the area <br />disturbed by the relocation of the Fountain Mutual Ditch. <br />The latter work was done by Castle Concrete, but because it <br />occurred on the Daniels Sand Pit #2 permit area will be <br />reported here. <br />The entrance area to the operation has benefited from <br />the additional seeding. It has shown a good increase in <br />plant diversity as well as some increase in density. <br />Increasing diversity was the primary goal of the reseeding <br />as density was already good. <br />The new ditch location is showing continued signs of <br />development. The fact the slope faces east is of <br />considerable benefit in aiding the development of the <br />vegetation, but as is usually the case in sandy soils, <br />development is slow. <br />FILE 73-7 ANNUAL REPORT - 1988/1989 PAGE 4 OF 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.