My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984-04-09_REPORT - M1978352
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1978352
>
1984-04-09_REPORT - M1978352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 2:42:23 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:06:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978352
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/9/1984
Doc Name
NOTTINGHAM S&G PN 78-352 EAGLE PIT
From
MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING
To
EAGLE CNTY
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Page 6 - <br /> • completely reclaimed and revegetated. The area will eventually <br /> probably be of higher visual quality than now exists as the land <br /> can be "shaped" and will suyppxt more vegetation than now exists <br /> due to the underlying soil and a final contouring that better <br /> retains moisture. <br /> G) Land Use <br /> The permitted land use is certainly compatible with land use <br /> planning and is a productive use of the land. The area, after <br /> mining, will essentially have the same land use possibilities <br /> that now exist. No land use option, other than mining will have <br /> been eliminated. <br /> The permitted land use will have no long term negative impacts oil <br /> adjacent lands. There may be short term impacts, ie. development <br /> on adjacent lands may be slowed while the pit is in operation. <br /> However, due to the separation of developable lands to the north <br /> by the Eagle River, to the south by U.S. Highway 6 and the railroad <br /> and the very narrow border on the east and west, these impacts are <br /> probably minimal. <br /> H) Circulation/Transportation <br /> The historic access to the permit area and the proposed future <br /> • access will be via the existing access at the east end of the <br /> project. This access is at a very good location as the sight <br /> distance for both the railroad and U.S. Highway 6 is very good. <br /> As can be seen under the heading Quantitative Imformation, the <br /> highest average hourly traffic volume for 1983 occured in July <br /> and was 1. 8 vehicles per hour. Obviously, this is a minimal <br /> traffic volume. <br /> The asphalt hot plant will increase the traffic on a monthly <br /> basis when in production, but will have little impact on a daily <br /> basis. The reason for this is that paving is the last operation <br /> in road construction and typically all other hauling operations <br /> will be completed. <br /> The asphalt plant is capable of producing 150 tons per hour. <br /> At this maximum production rate, ten semi trucks with a capacity <br /> of fifteen tons each would be required. There will also be three <br /> asphalt tanker trucks per day delivering asphalt oil to the site. <br /> The asphalt plant will be used on a very limited basis as there is <br /> a very limited market in Eagle County. For example, the Lake Creek <br /> Road Project completed in 1983 was a sizeable project for Eagle <br /> County. This project required approximately 3000 tons of asphalt <br /> or about two and one-half to three days of actual production. <br /> • In reviewing the State Highway Access Code , Acceleration/Deceleration <br /> and/or turn lanes are not required. A report submitted by Leigh , <br /> Scott and Cleary, Inc. in November, 1979 also came to this same <br /> conclusion. A copy of this report is included and marked Exhibit D. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.