Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine 2003 Annual Hydrology Report <br />36 <br />Table 12 <br />Recommended Hydrologic Monitoring System Revisions <br />C <br /> Approximate Screened Interval <br /> Location Ground Depth Total Depth Formation <br /> Elevation tft) <br />Eliminated S rin s ft. (ft) <br />G-26 T13S, R90W, Sec. 19, SE, NW 6960 - - - - Colluvium <br />G-28a T13S, R90W, Sec. 19,NW,SE 7057 -- -- Colluvium <br />G-30 T13S, R90W, Sec. 19, NE,SW 6900 -- -- Alluvium <br />G-31 T13S,R90W,Sec.19,SW,SW 7027 -- -- Alluvium <br />G-35 T13S, R91 W, Sec. 24, SW,NE 6814 - - - - Colluvium <br />G-49 TI3S, R91 W, Sec. 24, NW,NE 6400 - - - - Colluvium <br />Eliminated Surface <br />Stations <br />Lower Gribble Gulch TI3S, R90W, Sec. 19, SE, NW 6600 - - - - - - <br />Eliminated Wells <br />SOM-2-H T13S, R90W, Sec. 29, SE,NW 7870 Casin Colla sed 716.8 F-Seam <br />SOM-16-H TI3S, R90W, Scc. 28, SW,NW 8030 Casin Colla sed 1034.0 F-Seam <br /> Barren mbr. <br />SOM-45-H1 T13S, R90W, Sec. 29, NE,SW 7700 Casin Colla sed 320.0 Mesa Verde Fm. <br />So. W-1 T13S, R90W, Sec. 29, NW,SW 8020 Casin Colla sed 1380.0 B-Seam <br />96-27-I TI35, R90W, Sec. 27, NW,NE 7870 Casin Colla sed 1320.0 E-Seam <br />New Wells <br />SOM-3 B, SOM-3 E, <br />L. Dry Fork Alluvial Details presented in Table 5 - - - - - - - - <br />U. Dry Fork. Alluvial <br />03-I1-1 E <br />Tn WY2003 the West Elk Mine monitoring system was operating as designed and provided <br />adequate data to assess potential mine induced impacts to the area's hydrologic system, with the <br />exception of data collected at three stream stations and five wells. Upper Deep Creek, Lower Deep <br />Creek, and Upper Dry Fork surface water stations that are not functioning properly due to changing <br />stream characteristics. The casing in wells SOM-45-H1, SOM-2-H, SOM-16-H, 96-27-1, and <br />SO.W-1 have collapsed during the past several years rendering them dysfunctional. <br />Pressure transducers and data loggers were installed in the open stream channels at the Deep Creek <br />stations. Control channel sections were established at each site. Flumes were not installed at these <br />locations to limit impacts based on U.S. Forest Service (USFS) conditions. The Deep Creek stream <br />channel is very dynamic and has changed considerably since the sites were established. As a result <br />of erosion and sediment deposition the control channels used to calibrate the pressure transducers <br />and gauge the stream flows are constantly changing and the flow data collected for Deep Creek in <br />WY2002 and WY2003 is not considered accurate. The data and graphs presented in this report <br />September 2004 HydroGeo, Inc. <br />