Laserfiche WebLink
• reclamation of the CBA 2 as well as for the future CRDA 3. <br />Borrow material was hauled from the site during June and July <br />as part of the cover for the first three benches of CRDA 1. <br />Approximately 14,400 cy of material was removed from the site <br />and 3.0 acres were disturbed. Additional material is <br />available from this location and the area disturbed so far <br />will continue to be used for access. No redistribution of <br />topsoil was done. Large rocks segregated from this area were <br />stockpiled on the site for future use in erosion control or <br />for redistribution on the reclaimed area. Topsoil salvaged <br />from the surface of this area is stockpiled on site. <br />CRDA 1 Topsoil Salvage Area No. 3. Part of this area was <br />stripped during construction of CRDA 1 and piled in Topsoil <br />Pile No. 6. A small boundary adjustment to this area was <br />permitted in TR-17 as a source of additional cover material <br />for the CRDA 1. In June 1994 approximately 6" of topsoil was <br />removed from the surface of the area to be disturbed and <br />placed in temporary stockpiles around the site. Straw bale <br />were placed around the disturbance area for sediment control. <br />Available borrow material was removed. Approximately 3500 cy <br />of material was removed from the area and 0.7 acres were <br />disturbed. Borrow material was depleted from this area and <br />the topsoil redistributed. <br />• Temporary Haul Road. This small area connecting CBA 2' and <br />the Topsoil Salvage Area No. 3 was cut and filled in June 1994 <br />to facilitate the movement of material from CBA 2 to the <br />benches on CRDA 1. The 0.1 acres disturbed was regraded in <br />July 1994. Silt fence was installed below this area for <br />sediment control. <br />The following Table B-94 shows the newly disturbed acreages <br />and also shows the calculated volume of material excavated for <br />placement on the refuse piles. These volumes are greater than <br />the calculated volume of material placed on the piles, see <br />Table C-94 and D-94. Part of the difference may be in the <br />accuracy of airphotos taken 10 years apart with their 2' <br />contour intervals, and part was that greater thicknesses of <br />material were placed on portions of the piles. <br />• <br />