Laserfiche WebLink
Spring and Pond 13-6 was undermined during the end of 1992. The spring at this <br />location had measurable flow in June and August. The water quality analyses <br />collected showed pazameters generally consistent with previously established <br />values. <br />Terror Creek <br />Four springs located within the Terror Creek drainage (refer to Table 5 and Map <br />No. 4-1) were monitored during 1995. Spring 6 Pond 17 and Spring 1-5, are <br />located outside of the anticipated extent of m; n;nq activity. Spring & Pend 20, <br />Spring & Porn 7-1 were undP*~n~~; during the East Pod development, panels EP-3 <br />& EP11. All four springs have extensive data collected to characterize the <br />typical hydrology at these sites. However, these locations were identified and <br />targeted by the Division as adjudicated water rights within the permit azea. <br />No adverse mine related imq~acts or other irregularities were noted at any of the <br />Terror Creek springs. <br />S97RF'ACE YUt'~ MONITORING STATIONS -STREAMS AMID DITCT~S <br />• Monitoring of surface water stations during 1995 was concentrated in the Stevens <br />C~llch and East ROatCdp Creek areas as those drainages had seen recent mining <br />activity and were projected for further activity during the current permit term. <br />In general, no adverse inlaacts attributable to mining were evident at any of the <br />monitored surface water stations (refer to Table 5 and Map No. 4-1). Stations <br />SW-5, Stevens Gulch, SW-6, East Roatcap Creek, and SW-10, Z;error Creek exhibited <br />normal flaws and water quality pazameters consistent with previous years data. <br />No evidence of subsidence img~acts in these drainages was apparent. Mining <br />occurred in the Stevens (Ulch drainage upstream of site SW-5 during 1993 in <br />Panel C. Panel C mining was designed and conducted to prevent the development <br />of subsidence in order to protect the waterway and certain structures located <br />in the vicinity. Data collected during 1995 indicates these protective measures <br />were successful. <br />SSIRFACE YiA'Q7t MONITORING 577-TIQNS -SMALL AREA E74Z~PIONS <br />The East Mine fan level was defined as a small azea exemq~tion as drainage from <br />this area (refer to Map 8-1) is not conveyed to a sediment pond. T7tree sample <br />• points were defined at this location and samq~led for cronformance with the NPDES <br />dischazge alternative limitations requirements associated with dischazges <br />occurring as a result of precipitation events of less than the 10-year 24-hour <br />7 <br />