My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP12263
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP12263
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:51:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/29/1988
Doc Name
EDNA MINE ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT PN C-80-001
From
MLRD
To
PITTSBURGH & MIDWAY COAL MINING CO
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. David Beverlin - 2 - February 26, 1988 <br />3. The approved surface water plan specifies instantaneous flow measurements <br />will occur at sites TR-b and OK-a in conjunction with water quality <br />sampling. However, as addressed in the AHR, this information is not <br />being collected. Again, water quality data are incomplete without <br />simultaneous flow data, P 8 M needs to commence taking these flow <br />measurements. <br />4. A quality control check of the field electrical conductivity (EC) <br />measurements compared against total dissolved solids (TDS) reveals this <br />data collection needs to be improved. Typically, EC measurements equal <br />or exceed TDS, whereas, the data reveals EC measurements average only 77% <br />of the TDS concentrations. The meter should be calibrated against <br />standards each time the meter is used. Also, the meter being used by <br />P & M may not report EC at 25°C (specific conductance). Please indicate <br />~/ if the meter does do this or if conversions must be hand calculated. <br />,S~ In the past, a spring and seep survey has been submitted each January. <br />/ Please submit the results from the 1987 survey. <br />Based on the detailed AHR, it is the Division's belief a number of <br />changes should be made since some of the parameters being analyzed are <br />far below standards and could be dropped; some of the parameters being <br />analyzed are incompatible with existing standards or current <br />environmental perspective on the form of analysis; and certain components <br />at the Edna Mine are not being analyzed. The Division recommends the <br />following items be included in a technical revision application to modify <br />the existing hydrology monitoring plan. <br />A. Arsenic, selenium, zinc, mercury, and dissolved oxygen may be <br />dropped from the long parameter list since these parameters occur <br />at levels far below applicable standards. <br />e. A quality assurance check, using a mass balance evaluation between <br />the major cations and anions, is performed by the Division to <br />verify that acceptable full suite analysis occurs. As previously <br />discussed with you, the Division performed such an analysis of the <br />August, 1987 analysis and determined that it appeared there were <br />analytical quality control difficulties. It turns out that where <br />the TDS is less than 550 mg/1 and potassium and chloride are not <br />analyzed, the mass balance methodology does not provide accurate <br />results. (Table 1) Therefore, for those sites that historically <br />have TDS values below 550 mg/1, potassium and chloride should be <br />analyzed. <br />C. Nitrogen speciation is unclear due to the current analysis of <br />NO2-N03. To accurately assess the impacts, if any, of <br />nitrogen, analysis should be performed for nitrite and nitrate <br />separately. Also, for surface water samples, un-ionized ammonia <br />should be analyzed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.