My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP12263
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP12263
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:51:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/29/1988
Doc Name
EDNA MINE ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT PN C-80-001
From
MLRD
To
PITTSBURGH & MIDWAY COAL MINING CO
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"~ • III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII f 3 <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlreetor <br />February 29, 1988 <br />Mr. David Beverlin <br />Pittsburg & Midway <br />P.O. Box 176 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado <br />Coal Mining Company <br />80467 <br />Re: Edna Mine Annual Hydrology Report; Permit C-80-001 <br />Dear Mr. Beverlin: <br />The Division has completed the review of the AHR received on December 10, <br />1987. The submittal was very well organized with very useful graphs and an <br />excellent narrative that provided a historic perspective and a cogent analysis <br />of the data. Such a report is easy for the Division to review and to compare <br />against the approved hydrologic monitoring plan. <br />During our review, a number of concerns were identified as addressed below. <br />Some of these concerns were previously discussed with you during a telephone <br />conversation with Ms. Cathy Begej. Also, as addressed below the Division <br />believes some changes should be made to the approved plan based upon results <br />of the AHR. As addressed in the regulations, specifically Rule 1.04(136), <br />such changes should be submitted as a technical revision application. I have <br />included a revision application form for your execution when submitting this <br />revision application. <br />1. The approved surface water monitoring plan specifies field parameters <br />will be monitored seven times a year, However, the required monitoring <br />is regularly being performed only six times. As obtaining this <br />information during all periods when the water is not frozen is important, <br />P 8 M needs to ensure that monitoring occurs seven times annually. <br />The approved surface water plan specifies that continuous flow monitoring <br />for the Kol1 ditch flume, for site TR-a, and for the Homestead ditch <br />diversion will be performed for six months of the year. Submitted data <br />averaged monthly flow from the charts an average of five months per year <br />during the last five years. P & M needs to ensure that data is collected <br />for the entire six month period. While average monthly flow data <br />provides seasonal information, the Division also needs to know <br />instantaneous flow information in conjunction with water quality data. <br />Please provide instantaneous flow values with all surface water quality <br />samples. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.