My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP06512
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP06512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:36:59 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:22:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
1992 Annual Hydrologic Report
Annual Report Year
1992
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Annual Hydrologic Report <br />• Page Four <br />related to mine inflows. Diagram 592-6 was prepared to graph TDS <br />against time. Little information is available to assess why <br />changes occurred but the most important factor was the location <br />from which pumping occurred. The source of 1979 - 80 water was <br />from the development of No. 1 North Mains toward Location 1. From <br />1981 - 86 the source was primarily Roadside Mine inflow location <br />3 but also included some from location 5 after 1984. During 1987 <br />and 1988 no water was being discharged but was drained to <br />abandoned areas of the mine. Since 1988 the source has primarily <br />been location 3 with minor amounts of location 5. The spike in <br />1992 had to do with an increase in flow at location 3 caused by <br />renewed irrigation above the mine. <br />Discharge point 002 had not reached the point of discharge by the <br />end of the hydrologic year. As projected in the 1991 AHR, <br />discharge did start in December 1992. Information on this <br />outfall will be included in the 1993 AHR. Table 592-6 is a <br />summary of former monitoring results, Diagram 592-7 was prepared <br />to plot TDS against time. Up until 1983 this outfall was <br />primarily from dewatering at Roadside inflow location no. 1 and <br />inflows to the north. As more area was developed the TDS went <br />up. Since 1983 increasing amounts of water from location 5 was <br />routed through this outfall which diluted the TDS. Since 1986 <br />• pumping was only done for a few months in 1989. <br />Table 592-7 was prepared to summarize monitoring information from <br />outfall 003. This outfall was a dewatering well from the old <br />Cameo Mine. As mining in the Cameo No. 1 Mine proceeded past the <br />old mine, the water level dropped below the pump. Diagram 592-8 <br />was prepared to plot TDS against time. Note that pumping from <br />this site has not been done since 1979. This outfall has been <br />dropped from out CDPS permit. <br />Discharge point 004 continued to discharge all year from the <br />Cameo No. 1 Mine. A list of weekly monitoring results is given <br />on pages SF-9 thru SF-11. Table 592-8 is a summary of results <br />for the year and Table 592-9 is a summary of results since 1979. <br />Table 592-10 summarizes the average monthly flow. These flows <br />show a modified seasonal relation. Part of the discharge is <br />manually regulated from an old portion of the mine without a <br />direct connection to inflows. Diagram 592-9 was prepared to plot <br />TDS against time. The Cameo No. 1 Mine reached its maximum <br />extent of development in the spring of 1982 corresponding with <br />peak TDS readings. The downward trend from there may indicate a <br />flushing of minerals in the flow path of the water. The wide <br />range of TDS levels since 1988 has to do with various <br />combinations of the 3 water sources being pumped. The portal <br />under drain at Cameo inflow location 1, the sealed area at <br />location 8 and the rest of the mine. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.