Laserfiche WebLink
• Mr. Joseph Dudash - 4 - April 25, 2001 <br />monitoring of Sheep Corral surface water D2-1 was taken, although the flow rate was 0.4 <br />gallons per minute. Please explain. <br />This analysis of this minimal flow was overlooked by the sampler. The operator will <br />analyze any flow which characterizes the surface water of the drainages identified in the <br />monitoring plan. <br />11. On monitoring point table page 81 of the 1999 AHR, no fourth quarter full suite <br />monitoring of Steven's Gulch surface water location Steph-low was sampled, even though <br />the flow rate was 0.3 gallons per minute. Please explain. <br />This analysis of this minimal flow was overlooked by the sampler. The operator will <br />analyze any flow which characterizes the surface water of the drainages identified in the <br />monitoring plan. <br />13. On monitoring point table page 88 in the 1999 AHR, there is no full suite sampling for <br />DH-16 for 1999, even though there is water in the well. Please explain this omission. In <br />addition, the water level recorded in this well for 9/10/99 is over 320 feet higher than just <br />3 months before. Please explain. <br />DH-16 is blocked at 60 feet. No water can be drawn from the well due to this fact. <br />~ During the early monitoring events of 1999, an M-Scope could be lowered to the water <br />level, but no water could be bailed for a sample. During the last event, the M-Scope <br />would not pass 60 feet. The static water level will not be reported at 60 feet in the 2000 <br />AHR. <br />14. The 1999 AHR monitoring point tables for drill holes DH-57, DH-58 and DH-58a show <br />only one sample was analyzed for each monitoring hole during 1999. Table 1 of the <br />1999 AHR shows that semi-annual full suite and quarterly field parameters are to be <br />sampled. Please explain. <br />The operator reported partial year sampling after the initialization of these wells during the <br />summer of 1999. Please advise the operator if the Division wants partial year monitoring <br />withheld from the AHR. <br />1 S. The foornotes for DH-58 and DH-58a, on monitoring point table pages 97 and 98 <br />respectively, state that the baseline data was gathered for a period from 1905 to 1997. Is <br />this a misprint or has there been reliable data during that length of time? <br />The typographical error has been corrected. <br />• 16. The monitoring point table for TC-up is missing from the 1999 AHR. Please submit this <br />page for inckrsion into the report. <br />