Laserfiche WebLink
wells aze described using the same symbol. Please correct as necessary. <br />7. Where are the two stock ponds in Ciruela Canyon that are described in the text? <br />8. Page 23 of the text describes overburden well GE-17 in Sawmill Canyon. Should this <br />be GE-77? <br />9. On the same page, what does the sentence mean which begins "Sampling difficulties <br />in uniquely identifying bedrock monitoring sites..:'? Does this indicate sampling visits <br />were missed? If so, which visits were not made as per the approved monitoring <br />plan? <br />Monitoring Frequency <br />The following omissions or inconsistencies were noted. Please correct or explain each as <br />necessary. <br />Groundwater <br />1. CCAW-1; May and August field parameters are missing. <br />2. PAW-1; Please explain the 17.7 foot depth to water measured in February. <br />Also, zero minimum values erroneously affect the average values. These <br />should be corrected or removed (1992). <br />3. What explanation can be provided for the spastic variation of depth-to-water <br />measurements of ]2 and 17 feet over the period of record for PAW-3? <br />Again, 1992 and 1994 zero values should be corrected. <br />4. Zero values should be corrected for PAW-5 and PAW-6. <br />5. What does the November notation "bailed out-contaminated" mean for PAW- <br />7. Please provide specifics. Again, zero values need corrected. <br />6. May sampling visits were missing for IlA-221, LA-264, NM-20, NM-21, NM- <br />22, SF-1, NEW-2, NEW-4. <br />7. LA-221; November visit is missing. Two of four full suite samples are missing. <br />Three water level values are reported as 224 feet. The rest are reported as <br />324 feet. Which are accurate? Furthermore, LA-221, 1994 values of 56 feet <br />to water were reported under well IA-264 in the 1994 AHR. Please explain <br />the confusion of the data reported for this well. <br />8. LA-264; Values for this site seem very consistent at 55-60 feet until <br />