My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE139144
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE139144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:39:55 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 8:21:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/8/2007
Section_Exhibit Name
2.7 Fish and Wildlife
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
type for each sampling session. Morning transects were summarized separately from <br />evening transects. These compilations summarize The total number of each individual <br />species observed and the total number of observations for all species during the <br />entire five day sampling period. Species diversity was calculated for each transect <br />during each sampling session. Diversity was calculated by Shannon-Wiener's formula <br />(Whittaker 1975). <br />An index of similarity (Colwell and Futuyma 1971) was also calculated between <br />transects in different habitat types for each sampling session. <br />Abundance was calculated from the flushing transect data as the total number <br />of individuals observed divided by the distance traversed in k m. Perpendicular <br />sighting distances, described in Emlen (1971), were not used in calculations of <br />abundance because of the difficulty of estimating distance, particularly of flying <br />birds, and the problem created by different observability of various species. <br />In the calculation of abundance for morning transects, species that were seen <br />only on The evening transects were added to the morning transect data to arrive at <br />total abundance. Abundance of a particular species in a single habitat was obtained <br />by averaging abundance from the sampling sessions during which that species was <br />present. For example, May and July samples were averaged to obtain abundance for <br />summer residents. <br />Abundance of rodents from line-trapping was calculated as the total number <br />caught divided by the number of trap nights and converted to number/100 trap nights. <br />Grid trapping yielded density estimates which were calculated as The total number <br />of rodents caught divided by the area covered by the grid. <br />Aquatic Biology <br />Four study locations (stations) were selected on Trout Creek and two stations <br />on Oak Creek to evaluate the fisheries resource in the vicinity of the Edna Mine <br />(Exhibit 2.7-10). Each station was selected so os to be representative of the stream <br />in that area, Taking into consideration cover, pool-riffle ratio, shading, and general <br />habitat features. Station lengths varied between 83-113 meters (283-370 feet). <br />Fish were sampled in the summer and fall seasons at each station using <br />backpack electrofishing gear. At least two sampling passes were made Through each <br />station each season, with upstream and downstream ends first blocked off by nets. <br />. Benthic invertebrates of Trout Creek and Oak Creek were collected by taking <br />three samples with a Surber square-foot bottom sampler. Collections were made in <br />2.7-73 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.