Laserfiche WebLink
West E[k Mine <br />Table 65 Surface Areas of Alluvial Deposits Near the West Elk Mine <br />Stream Total Area mil Alluvial Fan Area mil <br />North Fork Gunnison River 1.40 0.29 <br />S Nester Gulch 0.04 <br />Minnesota Creek 0.68 <br />D Fork Minnesota Creek 0.14 <br />East Fork Minnesota Creek 0.29 <br />South Fork Minnesota Creek 0.07 <br /> <br />The soils in this location aze primarily deep clays. The Haplaquoll soil predominates. It is <br />associated with beaver activity and commonly exhibits mottled conditions in subsurface horizons. <br />The alluvial origin of this material is plausible because of the beaver activity and downstream <br />channel blockage from a landslide and from Minnesota Reservoir dam which was placed at the <br />blockage point. Normally the soil is saturated with water at or near the surface. Because of absence <br />of good aeration, organic matter content is high. <br />The valley floor in this reach of the Dry Fork would be incapable of supporting agricultural <br />activities without proper drainage. Approximately 20 percent of the total alluvial fill deposits above <br />Minnesota Reservoir has an artificially high water table as a result of backwater conditions from the <br />reservoir pool, This area could not be drained adequately without removing the reservoir. Even with <br />adequate drainage on the remaining azea, the agricultural development would be restricted to <br />grasses and pasture because of the high elevations and short growing season. Furthermore, the <br />beaver ponds and willow thickets aze an important factor in the general ecological picture, since <br />they help regulate stream flow, provide water for domestic animals and wildlife, and provide <br />wildlife cover. <br />The Hydrology and Mining Methods Sections detail the mining activities currently scheduled to <br />take place under Dry Fork and the safeguazds that will be taken to preserve the hydrologic integrity <br />of Dry Fork. Atlantic Richfield, with guidance from OSM and OMLR personnel, is developing a <br />subsidence monitoring program. The information obtained will be used to refine the subsidence <br />control plan for the mining azea under Dry Fork, if necessary, to protect the hydrologic balance. <br />Thus water availability at Minnesota Reservoir will not be affected by the mine. Additionally, <br />Atlantic Richfield is working with the various ditch and reservoir companies holding water rights <br />on Minnesota Creek and its tributaries to develop an augmentation plan. This plan, when finalized, <br />will detail mitigation efforts for short and long term effects to water rights holders should unforseen <br />factors affect the hydrology of Dry Fork. <br />The other location of possible alluvial deposits within the mine permit area is within the west <br />branch of Sylvester Gulch as shown on (on map 66). The Sylvester Gulch Valley widens slightly <br />in this location and there is a sharp break in slope from the valley sides. However, the alluvial <br />origin of the valley deposits at this location is doubtful. The soils aze a deep clay Arquistolls. <br />• They aze susceptible to mass movement and aze typically found on side hill locations <br />(Reconnaissance Soil Survey, West Elk Study Area, 1976). The lack of base level control that <br />2.06-4 <br />