Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />. would favor clay deposits in this reach of Sylvester Gulch suggests that the valley deposits are of <br />glacial or perhaps colluvial (mass movement) origin. <br />The flood irrigation potential of the site is also questionable. Stream flow records near the mouth of <br />Sylvester Gulch indicate that flow during the critical months of July and August are not common. <br />Agricultural development would be limited to grasses and pasture because of the elevation and <br />short growing season. <br />Outside the permit azea, but within the reconnaissance investigation area, there aze two general <br />areas of alluvial deposits. One is along the North Fork of the Gunnison River, and the other is along <br />Minnesota Creek and the East Fork of Minnesota Creek. The alluvial valley deposits aze wider and <br />contiguous where the streams leave the narrow canyons. Agricultural development is evident on <br />these lower valley fills. Isolated hay meadows are also found further up in the narrow valley of the <br />East Fork of Minnesota Creek. However, as one moves up the East Fork, these areas become more <br />isolated and were not found above the 6,800 ft. elevation. <br />Map 66 delineates those azeas along the main stem of Minnesota Creek where agricultural activities <br />are supported by irrigation or flood irrigation. For the purposes of this evaluation, mapping was <br />stopped at the west section line of Section 2, T14S, R91 W, a point over two miles from the pemut <br />boundary and downstream of the headgates of the Turner Ditch and Minnesota Ditch. During low <br />flows (i.e., irrigation demand periods) these two ditches effectively dry up Minnesota Creek. Below <br />this point return flow utilization, if any, is the water source for activities during low flows. <br />• hi the azea where irrigation is used, the flow regime of Minnesota Creek is totally controlled by a <br />series of reservoirs and diversion ditches. Beaver Reservoir effectively regulates spring runoff on <br />the East Fork as it is being filled. Reservoir releases regulate stream flow during late summer. <br />Minnesota (Monument) Reservoir effectively regulates spring runoff from Dry Fork with reservoir <br />releases controlling late summer flows. Additionally, the Deep Creek Ditch, an interbasin diversion, <br />supplies water to Minnesota Reservoir to satisfy the Reservoir Company's refill right. According to <br />the officers of the various ditch and reservoir companies, the southern tributaries to Minnesota <br />Creek (South Fork, Lake Fork, and Sam's Creek) aze all subjected to diversion and contribute very <br />little water during spring runoff and no water in the irrigation season. All water available at the <br />Beaver Reservoir will not be diminished as a result of mining. Map 27 shows that the F Seam <br />outcrops at the point where East Fork crosses the pemut azea. No mining will take place under the <br />East Fork. As a result, the West Elk Mine will not affect the East Fork drainage. <br />Because most or all of the water from the southern tributaries to Minnesota Creek is diverted by the <br />various ditches, Minnesota and Beaver Reservoirs regulate a majority of the spring runoff in <br />Minnesota Creek. During periods of low flow the reservoir releases into East Fork and Dry Fork <br />comprise the total flow of Minnesota Creek. By not affecting the integrity of the reservoirs and their <br />water supplies, Mountain Coa] Company will be insuring that mining activities associated with the <br />West Elk Mine will have no impact on the alluvial valley floor areas along the main stem and East <br />Fork of Minnesota Creek. <br />• During the site visit on September 9, 1980, the valley azeas of Dry Fork above Minnesota Reservoir <br />and East fork above the South Fork/East Fork confluence and below Beaver Reservoir were <br />2.06-5 <br />