Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />• by a thin veneer of clluvial deposits composed chiefly of debris from sheet erosion, deposits by <br />unconcentrated runoff or slope wash, together with talus, other mass movement accumulation and <br />wind-blown deposits. <br />30 CFR, Chapter VII, Subchapter A, Part 701.5 states that "Alluvial Valley Floors" means the <br />unconsolidated stream-laid deposits holding streams with water availability sufficient for <br />subirrigation or flood irrigation agricultural activities but does not include upland areas which are <br />generally overlain by a thin veneer of colluvial deposits composed chiefly of debris from sheet <br />erosion, deposits formed by unconcentrated runoff or slope wash, together with talus, or other mass <br />movement accumulations, and wind-blown deposits; and "Upland Areas" means, with respect to <br />Alluvial Valley Floors, those geomorphic features located outside the flood plain and the terrace <br />complex, such as isolated higher terraces, alluvial fans, pediment surfaces, landslide deposits, and <br />surfaces covered with residuum, mud flows or debris flows, as well as highland azeas underlain by <br />bedrock and covered by residual weathered material or debris deposited by sheet wash, rillwash, or <br />wind-blown material. <br />On the basis of the statutes and regulations, the primary consideration in the AVF investigation is <br />the identification of unconsolidated stream-laid deposits (alluvial deposits). Furthermore, these <br />deposits should be located within the valley floor and should not include isolated high terraces, <br />alluvial fans, or landslide deposits. Once alluvial valley floor deposits aze identified, then the <br />capability to support flood irrigated or subirrigated agricultural activities must be assessed. <br />. Identification of locations where unconsolidated stream-laid deposits might occur was performed <br />by analyzing aerial photographs of the mine permit azea and adjacent azeas. A break in valley sides <br />slope and an identifiable valley floor served as the primary criteria for selecting possible alluvial <br />deposits. These potential alluvial deposits locations have been mapped and the surface azea <br />calculated (Table 65). <br />From a geomorphic standpoint, the rugged mountainous terrain of the mine permit site has resulted <br />in drainages still in a youthful stage of development. The streams are confined in narrow, steep- <br />sided, V-shaped valleys with generally steep channel gradients. This is in duect contrast to the <br />broader flood plain type valleys found at lower elevations. Meanders, normally associated with <br />AVF development, aze absent. Generally, the streams are actively downcutting with the exception <br />of the reaches above the Minnesota and Beaver Reservoirs. For these stream reaches, erosional <br />downcutting has been curtailed by the change in base level these reservoirs represem;. <br />One of the locations for possible alluvial deposits within the mine permit azea is irmnediately above <br />the Minnesota Reservoir. The valley floor widens at this location and there is a d.efurite break in <br />slope from the steep sides confining the valley floor. Numerous beaver ponds and willow thickets <br />occupy the valley floor in this location, and grazing is limited to isolated locations along the <br />margins of the valley. <br />• <br />2.06-3 <br />