Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br />• MR. BANTA: Okay, we can include that in our discussion on the technical <br />issues. <br />MR. ENTZ: Alright. <br />MR. JOUFLAS: Okay, then. <br />MR. HOLDER: Mr. Chairman? <br />MR. JOUFLAS: Yes. <br />MR. HOLDER: I would like to admonish everyone that we are !going to be <br />extremely short on time and I'd like to ask people who have something relevant <br />to say that is new to be as concise as possible. And for other people, even <br />though you mdy agree wholeheartedly with what's being said, it's not necessary <br />for you to say it, too. I'd also like to go on record in apologizing for <br />eating my lunch in front of so many hungry people. I did save an apple if <br />anybody's hungry. <br />MR. JOUFLAS: Thank you, Davis. We might--I really don't want to, well, <br />I don't want to put in time limitations. We want to hear everybody that has <br />anyifiing new to say, as Davis says. But in the interests of time, I mean <br />we're--. Board, what do you think would be--for individuals or coroups, how <br />much time should we limit? <br />It will move along smartly and people will stop repeating and doing that <br />sort of thing if they have to get to their point in and sit down. What do you <br />think? A half an hour, an hour for each side to begin with and then we can <br />cut that down to --. What do we have here? Frank, you've got u<_, with the <br />Staff, their unlimited. Company, Committee with the new evidences, and the <br />Company again. Maybe, boy, we've got six hours. <br />MR. JOHNSON: I would suggest that on the Committee For Environmental <br />Soundness is again requesting that it be allowed to present some new direct <br />• testimony. So, perhaps you can get an estimate of time from thertr on that. <br />