Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br />• to, should allow them to produce additional direct testimony. However, again, <br />I think that their time for direct has passed under the procedure we set up <br />last month. So, that's a second issue the Board is going to have to address; <br />as to whether or not to allow additional direct testimony. Assuming, if you <br />do that, you allow the Committee For Environmental Soundness to present its <br />new witnesses, then the Company would like its chance to rebut the Staff's <br />presentation, to cross-examine the Committee For Environmental Soundness at <br />that time, and to continue the rebuttal cross-examination that they started <br />last month. After the Company goes forward with that, then the Committee For <br />Environmental Soundness will be given the opportunity to present rebuttal and <br />cross-examination. And then both of the parties, concluding that, both of the <br />parties request the opportunity to present a summation, with the Company going <br />first and the Committee For Environmental Soundness going second. Is that <br />fairly clear? Fairly muddled? <br />MR. JDUFLAS: Anybody have any questions for Mr. Johnson? <br />• <br />MR. ENTZ: Mr. Chairman? <br />MR. JDUFLAS: Yeah, Mike? <br />MR. ENTZ: I would also like to know if we could include in that somewhat <br />of a review by Staff of what transpired because I just got this toddy so I'm <br />not very familiar with what went on at that meeting and I would 'pike to be <br />educated a little bit more to that respect. <br />MR. JDUFLAS: Do you think you can handle that? <br />MR. BANTA: You want just an overview on what the mining anti reclamation <br />plan is? Is that what your're asking? <br />MR. ENTZ: Yes. <br />C, <br />J <br />