My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE136825
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE136825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:37:27 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 5:10:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/22/1989
Doc Name
MINUTES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br />MR. JOUFLAS: Your attention please. We are going to reconvene now. Ort <br />Permit Public Hearing File No. M-88-112, Battle Mountain Resources. I think <br />we'll have Mr. Johnson address you first on where we are going to go and then <br />we're going -- let's just get our ground rules going and we'll go from there. <br />MR. JOHNSON: Good Afternoon, I'm Frank Johnson. I'm with the Attorney <br />General's office. I'm attorney to the Board here. I want to la,y out same of <br />the procedural issues. Up to this point, the procedure that we nave been <br />following is, at the last meeting, the staff gave a presentation and the <br />Company then followed with its presentation. At that point the Committee For <br />Environmental Soundness and the other parties to this action presented their <br />direct presentation. We have also heard comments from the general public at <br />the last meeting. The Board closed comments from the general public at the <br />last meeting but then we moved into an area in which the Company was given.the <br />opportunity to cross-examine the Staff and the other parties on their <br />presentation. One issue that has come up at this point that the board is <br />• going to need to address briefly is that there is a request from at least one <br />• they already presented their direct presentation and the Board, if it wants <br />member of the public that he wants to address the board again, and that's Mr. <br />Joe Espinoza, the Mayor of San Luis. At the last meeting, we ended the <br />meeting while the Company was presenting its rebuttal presentatioon. Today, we <br />met with the Division, ndself, met with the Company and the attorney for the <br />committee For Environmental Soundness and we came up with a proposed procedure <br />to follow and that is that the staff would like a moment to outline some <br />general concerns and to outline what has transpired in the last month. There <br />have been some meetings with the parties and the Board would like a chance_to <br />address those issues. The Company would like to have a moment to respond to <br />any representations the Staff, makes during that presentation. A1: that point, <br />we suggest that the Committee For Environmental Soundness be given its <br />opportunity to present its rebuttal and cross-examine. Wait, excuse me. The <br />Committee For Environmental Soundness has shown up today and they are <br />requesting to be given the opportunity to present additional direct <br />testimony. They have some additional witnesses that they would like to <br />present. Again, I think the original procedure called for them, I mean that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.