Laserfiche WebLink
During the peak of the eagle season, the frozen river supported no <br />• waterfowl so I suspect that carrion constituted the majority of the <br />diet. Large numbers of deer and elk wintered in the North Fork Valley, <br />and the harshness of the winter of 1979 produced both road and winter- <br />kills. Because of the mildness, winter kills were not abundant in <br />1980. Low eagle numbers in the Nork Fork could perhaps be explained by <br />this lack of food, <br />After the ice broke, there were a few waterfowl using the banks of the <br />river. The number of ducks was hard to determine with fixed-wing <br />flights because the emergent vegetation hid them from view. Rodents <br />and rabbits may have also been constituents of the wintering bald eagle <br />diet. <br />Same fish may have been caught after the ice broke. The value of this <br />resource, according to data collected by the Colorado DOW in 1978, is <br />below average to poor, primarily due to the effects of irrigation. Two <br />fish hatcheries along the river may contribute some to the diet of the <br />wintering bald eagle, although personnel at the Federal hatchery did <br />not seem to think that their loss to hunting eagles was large. <br />An adult bald eagle was observed feeding on a coyote carcass on Paonia <br />Reservoir, suggesting that eagles are opportunists and will exploit any <br />available carrion. <br />Disturbances in the North Fork Valley are numerous. There is a sub- <br />• stantial amount of mining activity due to ongoing coal excavations. <br />Disturbances from other activities are suspected to be high because of <br />the proximity of wintering bald eagle habitat to the human environment. <br />Powerlines are a problem in the North Fork. They are numerous, and <br />cross the river frequently. It is suspected that at least part of them <br />are not raptor-safe and should be checked further. This hazardous area <br />should be flown with caution. <br />IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES <br />The opportunities for improvement of bald eagle habitat along the North <br />Fork are minimal because of land ownership patterns. Education, with <br />an emphasis on preserving the existing riparian habitat, is quite <br />possibly the only method available for the conservation of existing <br />wintering bald eagle areas. <br />Any opportunities to improve water quality and the fishery would un- <br />doubtedly benefit wintering bald eagles. <br />Although food appears to be abundant, <br />Besting that bald eagles in the North <br />because of continual development of r <br />project probably has little impact on <br />lative effects of several actions may <br />• to move to other areas. <br />numbers of birds are low, sug- <br />Fork Valley may be in trouble <br />iparian areas. Each isolated <br />the population, but the cumu- <br />be forcing wintering bald eagles <br />