My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE132830
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE132830
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:34 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
APPENDICES A & B
Section_Exhibit Name
Coal Transportation - TRANSPORTATION EA Removed by MR108 6/29/04
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Meeting Summary <br />Wednesday, May 4, 1983 <br />Page Lwo <br />Alternative #2 - Aerial Tramway <br />The aerial tramway is a high technology system similar to a ski lift opera- <br />tion. The construction basically consists of a steel tower and a continuous <br />wire rope with containers attached to the wire rope, The tramway would fol- <br />low the same route as the full conveyor and is also designed for 600 tons an <br />huur, A loading station would be located at the Orchard Valley Mine and an <br />unloading station at the train loadout area, Roads would he constructed to <br />the towers for maintenance. The aerial tramway would be operated in inter- <br />vals during a 24-hour period, The steel tower bases would he fenced, <br />Reclamation of the aerial tramway would be to remove the structure, remove <br />tine foundations, remove the roads, and restore the cuts and fills to the <br />approximate original contour, Topsoil would be redistributed and the area <br />reveyetated, The maximum width between towers would be 1,000 ft, <br />Comments, Ouestions, and Responses <br />question: Would the aerial tramway make more noise than a conveyor belt? <br />Response: No specific numbers are available, but noises would be caused <br />where the gyro hits the wheels of the full containers. <br />Alternative #3 - Pneumatic Caosule Pioeline <br />• This alternative is an air-powered pipeline. Capsules of material are <br />forced up and down the pipeline by differential air pressures. This alter- <br />native was suggested for analysis by the Bureau of Land Management. Designs <br />are being prepared for CWI by a company called TUBEXPRESS Systems, Inc. <br />The pipeline is basically a welded steel pipeline for loaded capsules. <br />Capsules would be brought back up to the Orchard Valley Mine in a return <br />pipeline. The pipeline would he designed to move 600 tons an hour at <br />intervals during a 24-hour day. The pipeline would be constructed in a <br />trench and backfilled along most of its length, Because bends could be made <br />in the pipeline, it would not have to be run straight from the Orchard Val- <br />ley Mine to Lhe train loadout. The route of the pipeline would basically be <br />along the powerline right-of-way. A loading station would be located at the <br />Orchard Valley Mine and an unloading station at the train loadout area, The <br />capsules would be turned over at the unloading station for unloading, <br />Comments, Questions, and Responses <br />Question: Would another tube be utilized as a hack-up system? <br />Response: No, another alternative would be utilized, <br />Question: What type of energy would be used? <br />Response: It would probably be electrical, <br />1 <br />E' <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.