My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE131402
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE131402
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:32:14 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 11:11:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977053
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/2/1982
Doc Name
POWELL CONSTRUCTION CO PIT FN 77-53
From
MLR
To
POWELL CONSTRUCTION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-z- <br />• <br />Exhibit B <br />1. In the original application materials, the creation of a pond was <br />-! mentioned. Presumably, this will not now be done, either during or <br />v after mining. Please clarify this situation. <br />2. As I now understand your intentions for this operation, no <br />further expansion (beyond the existing 6 acres) of this pit is planned. <br />This means that the future mining plans are merely to remove the <br />existing gravel stockpiles, remove some small amount of material in <br />u cutting all slopes that are not already 3H:1V back to this slope, <br />and doing reclamation. Does this indeed summarize youi plans? <br />3. Any new areas disturbed as a result of slope modifications or <br />other disturbance of new areas outside of the existing pit will have <br />topsoil available. All such topsoil should be. stripped and stockpiled <br />/ before the underlying gravel is removed. If the future timetable <br />V dictates that any stockpiled topsoil will be left for one growing <br />season or longer, it should be stabilized with a perennial grass <br />cover crop such as Western wheatgrass at a suggested broadcast <br />seeding rate of b.0 lbs. pure live seed per acre. <br />14. What is now the timetable for the remaining operations in this pit? <br />V 5. To what final depth is gravel to be removed in this pit? <br />6. Will any further fixed equipment be used to process gravel in this pit <br />J during the course of the final mining/reclamation activities in this pit? <br />For example, a crusher may have to be brought in to process the product <br />obtained from cutting back slopes. <br />Exhibit C <br />1. The map provide should have a scale such that the acreage included <br />< Lf~ under the permit area can be checked, and the relative distances between <br />)~ items on the map can be illustrated. <br />M~Q <br />2. Your map and your general location for the pit show Fort Garland to <br />' be 5 miles east of the pit. My inspection showed it to be closer to 0.5 <br />miles east of the pit. Please clarify this matter. <br />3. The probable location of any future fixed equipment should be shown <br />on the map. <br />4. The location of product stockpiles should be shown on the map. <br />5. Any landowners immediately adjacent to the permit area should be shown <br />on the map. <br />6. All mining and mining related acts <br />permit area. This includes haul roads <br />and topsoil stockpiles, as well as the <br />~ given should provide an outline of the <br />of the permit area, not just the pit. <br />than 6 acres, this should be noted and <br />cities should be included in the <br />constructed as part of the operation <br />actual pit area itself. The map <br />entire affected land that is a part <br />If this area turns out to be more <br />an extra $10/acre or part thereof <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.