My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE124542
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE124542
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:06 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:43:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/11/1983
Doc Name
FREI WALSTRUM MINE MLR DIVISION ADEQUACY LETTER FILE 83-33
From
ENVIRONMENT INC
To
PETER OCONNER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3. It is agreed that broadcasting seed on difficult sites <br />sometimes requires at least two times as much seed as drilling. <br />Unfortunately, we can find no reference which states unequivocally <br />that at least 80 seeds per square foot is needed for broadcasting <br />severe sites. All references we have seen, including SCS <br />literature, give drilled rates for favorable sites and simply <br />expand on that for less favorable sites. Favorable sites require <br />15 to 25 live seeds per square foot. Severe sites need 50°b to <br />100~b more and for broadcasting this should be doubled. <br />In our experience, machinery for broadcasting seed is very <br />inaccurate and can result in ranges of 35 to about 120 seeds per <br />square foot for a mixture designed to spread 60 seeds per square <br />foot. Therefore, the 14 seeds per square foot difference betvreen <br />our mixture and the rate you recommend is of little practical <br />significance. <br />iVith regard to north-facing slopes, the literature supports <br />an approach tvhere north-facing as well as east-facing slopes be <br />seeded at rates of about 50A of the south or west-facing slope <br />rates. This is clearly stated in Cook, Hyde, and Sims (1974) and <br />implied in most other references in listings of factors affecting <br />seeding rates. <br />In short, we feel that our designed mixtures and rates are <br />appropriate for the site and do not need to be altered. <br />4. Roclc mulch will not actually be spread. The reference to <br />rock mulch refers to the mulching effect of the rocks which will <br />be in the soil. Wood mulch will only be used on south-facing <br />areas. <br />5. The size of the chips produced by a standard chipper working <br />with variable sized materials end different types of wood can <br />hardly be controlled. The resulting chips range in size from less <br />than 1/4" to more than 4". <br />According to their paper on minesoil genesis, Schafer, <br />Nielsen, and Nettleton found that C/N ratios in eve~i old minesoils <br />were far from the natural equilibrium level of about 10. Even <br />after many years of growth the accumulated litter produced tivide <br />C/N ratios, problems with N availability, and low productivity as <br />well as stagnated succession. ]t appears that the addition of <br />any undecomposed material whether mulch or plant litter from years <br />of growth will adversely affect C/N ratios when dealing with <br />minesoils. Controlled grazing and/or the addition of N can Help <br />stabilize the ratio but apparently will not produce levels where <br />the ratio aprroaches 10. It appears that stable, "normal" C!N <br />ratios are only produced when the slow nitrogen cycling processes <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.