Laserfiche WebLink
6. A number of roads are noted on Exhibit C, but were not listed as structures as required by <br />Rule 6.4.3(g). In particulaz, Lafarge did not provide the name and address for any roads <br />within 200 feet of the affected land. In particulaz, please provide the name and address for <br />the owners of WCR 20%z, Shoreline Drive, the road south of the Lighthouse Cove, the road <br />leading to the gas/oil well and line, and roads located on the Cottonwood Pit. Please also <br />assure the Division that notice of the application was provided to these owners' of structures. <br />7. Lafarge did not depict the location of wells that may surround the Duckworth property. <br />Please depict all wells, and any lateral ditches that extend from the Smith and Emmons Ditch <br />and Idaho Creek. Please revise Exhibits C and S accordingly. <br />8. Please portray the type of present vegetation covering the affected land. In particulaz, please <br />identify the location of all wetlands (non jurisdictional & jurisdictional) and riparian areas on <br />Exhibit C. <br />Rule 6.4.4 Exhibit D- Mining Plan <br />9. Lafarge states that pastureland lies to the west of the proposed operation. DMG Files <br />indicate that the adjacent site has an approved Mining and Reclamation Permit issued by the <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board (NLRB). The operator is Aggregate Industries, WCR, <br />Pernxit No. M-1994-027. Because this is an approved plan, Lafarge will need to factor the <br />Duckworth mining and reclamation plan to account for the Aggregate Industries Site. In <br />particulaz, relocation of the Smith and Emmons ditch and floodplain issues will need to be <br />factored. See attached maps of the approved Aggregate Industries mining and reclamation <br />plan for further information. <br />10. Please state if Lafazge intends to install an asphalt plant and concrete batch plant on site. If <br />so, please locate the structures and describe how the facilities will be managed to ensure <br />groundwater and surface water will not be impacted. Tn addition, please describe the nature <br />and storage location for all hazardous waste that will be used on site. <br />11. Lafarge states that "sediment generated from localized stormwater runoff and disturbed <br />drainage will be detained in the ponds already existing at the previously permitted <br />Cottonwood pit (M--1988-042)." Please further describe how the water will be routed <br />towazds the Cottonwood ponds and provide designs of the predicted flow and structures that <br />will be used to facilitate this runoff. In addition, Lafarge will be required to revise the <br />mining and reclamation permit of the Cottonwood pit to account for this additional runoff. <br />12. On page 8 of 45 of the Duckworth Application, Lafazge states that mining is projected to <br />occur at the rate of .5 tons/year. This appeazs to be a typo. Please clarify the rate of mining <br />at the Duckworth Pit. <br />13. Lafazge proposes to ultimately mine through and relocate the Smith and Emmons Ditch. <br />Lafazge has not submitted a notarized agreement between Lafazge and the owner of the <br />Smith and Emmons Ditch to none through and relocate the structure. Until such agreement <br />is submitted and approved by the Division, Lafarge will need to revise all maps to reflect the <br />approved mining off- set distance from the Smith and Emmons Ditch. If such notarized <br />agreements cannot be achieved during this review period, then a revision to the permit will <br />need to be filed in the fixture prior to mining closer than the approved mining off-set distance. <br />