My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE116212
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE116212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:12:06 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:55:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
PART 779 PAGE 109 TO 216
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 779.20 (c) Continued. <br />• Due to lack of adequate flow in the Rrass and weed c}ioked channel <br />of Foide] Creek above Reservoir No. 1, only one dredge sample was <br />taken. Two dredge samples were subsequently taken in early July, <br />1979 from the reservoir as it is the most important aquatic habitat <br />in the upper reaches of Foidel Creek. <br />Surber samples were taken in duplicate from representative habitat <br />where flow was sufficient. Each sample represented one square foot <br />of bottom area. Duplicate Ekman dredge samples were taken from <br />representative pool habitat. Each Ekman sample consisted of two <br />grabs and thus was equivalent to one-half a square foot. A total <br />of 15 aquatic macroinvertebrate samples were collected. <br />In the field, each Ekman dredge sample was placed in a sieve <br />bucket (No. 30 mesh) and rinsed of excess silt and debris. The <br />samples were placed in wide-mouth polypropylene jars, labeled and <br />• preserved with 10 percent formalin. Surber samples were similarly <br />treated, labeled, and preserved with 10 percent formalin. <br />In the laboratory, samples were rinsed of excess formalin in a <br />standard No. 30 sieve and sorted from the debris in white enameled <br />pans. Sorted organisms were placed in 70 percent isopropyl alcohol <br />with glycerine. Samples were then identified and enumerated with <br />the aid of a dissecting microscope (7-80X). Specimens of the <br />family Chironomidae (midge larvae) were mounted on slides in CMC-10 <br />mounting medium and identified under a compound microscope. <br />Identifications were made to the lowest taxonomic level practicable <br />using the following references: Usinger (1956), Edmonson (1959), <br />Brinkhurst (1968), Beck (1976), Edmunds, et. al. (1976), Wiggins <br />(1977), and Pennak (1978). <br />Data calculated were density (ll/ft2), percent relative abundance, <br />• diversity (d), maximum diversity (d max), and equitability (E). <br />779-145 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.