My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114594
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:41 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 39 PAR 10/17/86 RESPONSES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
u. Empire has provided locations of certain of their test borings on <br />• Map 7, Geology and on various other maps in the permit package. <br />Some known exploration boreholes, however, are not located on any <br />map in the package. Empire should provide a comprehensive map with <br />locations of all test or exploration boreholes together with a <br />listing of the depths and elevations of each. <br />RESPONSE: Empire Energy Corporation has revised Map 7, Geology; <br />included Map 8A, "E" Seam Bottom Structure, and has submitted <br />additional confidential material to CMLRD by letter dated January <br />15, 1987 in addressing this concern. <br />Rule 2.05.6(3) Protection of Hvdrolooical Balance <br />a. Empire has indicated on page 2.04.7-21 that the No. 5 and No. 6 <br />Mines might be capable of surface discharge after the completions <br />of flooding. Mine seals will be used in the portal to prevent this <br />discharge. If the flooding results in discharge at the .level of <br />the portal, enough hydrostatic head might also be developed in the <br />flooded portions of the "E" seam to cause discharge in the subcrop <br />area under the Williams Fork River Valley. The mine water <br />resulting from this flooding will probably be more degraded than <br />currently encountered. Even significantly smaller discharge of <br />this more degraded water could equal or exceed the effects of the <br />discharge now permitted or anticipated from the active mines. <br />Empire should address this concern, submit estimates of the <br />quantity and quality of potential discharges into the Williams Fork <br />River and alluvium at the subcrops of the "E" coal seam & <br />hydraulically related sediments based on best available <br />information. Empire should also evaluate the effects on the <br />surface water and the alluvial aquifer into which this discharge <br />may occur. <br />Ci <br />39-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.