My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114594
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:41 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 39 PAR 10/17/86 RESPONSES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(abandoned Wise Hill No. 4 Mine)." This well is not identified as <br />• such on any map in the permit materials. According to Table 12, <br />age 2.04.78-25, it is not registered with the State Engineer's <br />office. Empire Energy should provide information as to location, <br />elevation and such other details for this well, (i.e., depth, zone <br />of completion quality of water, and details of testing, as it <br />possesses. <br />RESPONSE: Table 12, page 2.04.7-25 and Map 18, Water Rights have <br />been revised to address this issue. <br />r. The Francis Lux Well listed in Table 12, page 2.04.7-25, as <br />producing from the "Williams Fork" was omitted from Map 18, Water <br />Rights. Empire Energy should amend Map 18 accordingly. <br />RESPONSE: Map 18, Water Rights has been revised to address this <br />• issue. <br />s. The location for the Empire Energy well in SE NE 6-T5NOR91W is <br />erroneously listed in Table 12, page 2.04.7-25, as being in Section <br />31? Table 12. Empire Energy should correct the locations in Table <br />12 for the above wells. <br />RESPONSE: Table 12 has been revised to address this issue. <br />t. There are no elevations provided for Wells 5 & 5A on Table 3, <br />Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring Stations, page 2.04.5-6. Since <br />these wells are assumed to be part of the future hydrologic <br />monitoring system, elevations should be furnished. <br />RESPONSE: Table 3, page 2.04.5-6 has been revised to address this <br />issue. <br /> <br />39-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.