My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114330
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114330
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:27 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:28:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/17/2004
Doc Name
page 780-90 to 780-152
Section_Exhibit Name
Part 780 Reclamation Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Section 780.211b) Continued. <br />1. Installation of one spoil monitoring well in the reclaimed portion of the 720 Pit to <br />monitor water levels and quality in the backfilled spoil material. See Map 48, Mine <br />Area Monitoring Stations, for the proposed location of the new spoil well <br />(designated Well 99-1 ). This well should be adequate to monitor resaturation, <br />water level, and water quality in backfilled areas since the spoil unit is relatively <br />continuous and semi-homogenous as illustrated by Figure 40, Projected North- <br />South Pit Bottom Profile, Pit 1, Marr Pit and 20 Pit. <br />The Johnny Moore Syncline plunges moderately to the south, and the Kerr mining <br />operations recovered coal reserves along a portion of the west limb of the <br />syncline. Map 15a, Mine Area Ground Water Hydrology, indicates that the <br />prevailing direction of ground water flow is eastward toward the axis of the <br />syncline (parallel to the dip of the Sudduth coal seam on the west limb of the <br />syncline) and then southward with the plunge of the syncline. Prior to mining, <br />ground water flow was affected by both structural boundaries and minor lithologic <br />differences in the coal and overburden sequence. As mining progressed through <br />• the Marr Pit, 720 Pit, and Pit 1, however, the entire overburden sequence from the <br />southern end of the 720 Pit to the northern end of Pit 1 was disturbed and <br />replaced by undifferentiated backfill materials. Backfilling effectively eliminated <br />structural and lithologic boundaries, resulting in a relatively continuous, semi- <br />homogenous, unconsolidated spoil "unit" within the surrounding undisturbed <br />sedimentary sequence. <br />Given that the spoil unit is both unconsolidated and relatively continuous, spoil <br />water levels and quality should generally be consistent within the unit. In order to <br />monitor the rate of spoil resaturation and spoil water levels and water quality, Kerr <br />proposes to establish a spoil well in the central portion of the backfilled 720 Pit <br />area. This location is slightly south of the center of the spoil unit and should be <br />adequate for monitoring spoil ground water conditions while avoiding potential <br />secondary ground water effects from the nearby reclaimed Canadian Strip Mine. <br />Installation of the proposed spoil monitoring well will be deferred to allow <br />reasonable settlement and consolidation of the 720 Pit backfill, with installation <br />anticipated by fall of the year 2000. <br />TR-19 780-108a Revised August 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.