My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111914
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111914
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:22 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998058
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/23/1995
Doc Name
GRAVEL OPERATIONS ON THE TELLIER PROPERTY AND THE P&M PROPERTY
From
DOW
To
ROUTT CNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ~. ~. <br />State of Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and <br />Geology. Department of <br />Natural Resources <br />October 23, 1998 <br />1313 Sherman Street ,Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Ms Crosby and Mr Stevens: <br />26975 County Road 33A <br />Steamboat Springs <br />Colorado <br />60967 <br />This note is to document the additional verbal issues we brought to light during the informal hearing on <br />the Tellier Gravel Pit this past Tuesday. <br />To recap I am pessimistic about the suxess of the project. I believe a has unrealistic expectations for <br />success. I suspect Rs failure will be primarily a result of poor projections for demand. As such It is <br />important to us who live adjacent to the proposed site that sufficient financial and legal means be in <br />place to ensure the correct day to day operations and long term recovery plans are carried out. <br />The first component in a plan that will achieve this requires a detailed plan for operation and recovery of <br />the proposed mine. The second component requires methods for measuring compliance wRh Rs <br />various permRs. The third component requires statements of penaRies for non-compliance. The fourth <br />component requires Remization of the legal avenues pursuable to provide enforcement. <br />Without identifying each component, there is a serious risk that in the event of an economic downturn <br />at the site the quality of life of residerrts in the area both during the operation and after site recovery will <br />be compromised. <br />While the existing proposal has a fair amount of detail regarding part of one of the components (the <br />recovery plan) there is little or no discussion of the remaining components. There is a need for the <br />other components. There is also the need for clarifications and precision in the existing recovery plan <br />Finally there is a need to include commitments for day to day operations. This process is necessary <br />because wfthout precise knowledge of what is supposed to happen R is not possible to determine the <br />financial provisions necessary to handle a failing business plan. <br />Thanks again for this opportunity to comment <br />Sincerely, <br />David and Janet Bradley <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.