My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111887
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111887
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:20 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:58:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
MLRD - PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW - EDNA MINE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• B. Reclamation Tasks <br />1. Final Pit Backfillinc (Year 31 <br />Page 4.B-2 of the application indicates that the backfill <br />volume required is 200 cubic yards of material per foot of pit <br />length, as rer Exhibit 4.8-6. E::hibit 4.8-6 could not be <br />located in any cf the Divisions copies of the .rain application <br />or renewal application. In order to verify the applicants <br />volume estimates, E;:hibits 3.3-3 and 3.3-4 were used to <br />calculate and average pit cross-=_ectional areas, and E;:hibit <br />4.8-1 was used to determine nit length. Using the 3rd cut pit <br />cross-sectional areas from Section A-A' and H-B', an average <br />figure cf 52^.67 cubic yards per lineal foot of pit was <br />calculated (depth measured from bottom of lowermost mined coal <br />seam to the projected reclaimed surface line, width measured <br />from highwa'_l to closest ungraded spoil slope). This figure <br />differs substantially from the 200 cubic yards of material per <br />linear foot of pit provided in the renewal application. Total <br />pit length, estimated at 10,800 feet, was taken from Exhibit <br />4.8-_. The applicant needs to e::plain this apparent <br />discrepancy i:_ the volume calculations. If E::hibits 3.3-3 and <br />3.3-4 are representative of typical pit dimensions, the volume <br />figures pre=_ente3 ir. the application. will need to be revised <br />• accordingl}'. <br />THE EXHIBITS USED BY TY.E REVIE'r1ER ARE NOT APPROPRIATE TO USE <br />FDR DETERMINING THE FINAL PIT BACiCFILLING IN THE EVENT OF A <br />BOND FORFEITURE. THE RECLAIMED SURFACE CONTOURS SHOWN ON <br />EXHIBITS 3.3-3 AND 3-3.4 DO NOT RL'PRESENT THE FINAL SURFACE <br />CONFIGURATI:N THP.T WOULD BE ACHIEVED 0`JER THE LAST PIT MINED. <br />IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE YARDAGE 'NECESSARY TO RECLAIM THE <br />FINAL PIT EXHIBIT 4.8-5 MUST BE USED. EXY.IBIT 4.9-5 IS <br />ENCLOSED FOR THE REVIEWERS CONVEPIIENCE AND MAY HE IAISERTED <br />DIRECTLY INTO THE PERMIT. <br />2. Revecetat•ion <br />The applicant should revise the hourly farm tractor cost to <br />reflect current (1986) rates for such equipment. Rental rates <br />for each attachment (contour furrow, drill, fertilizer <br />spreader) should be added to the basic hourly tractor cost. <br />A REVISED SET OF BONDING CALCULATIONS ARE ENCLOSED WITH THE <br />APPROPRIATE COST CHANGES AS REOUE5TED. THE ENTIRE SECTION 4.8 <br />HAS BEEN REPRODUCED AND MAY PE SUE5TITUTED DIRECTLY INTO THE <br />PERMIT FOR THE EXISTING SECTION 4.9. <br />The current open shop labor rate for a farm tractor operator, <br />• as per the Department of Labor/Department of Highway's current <br />schedule is 13.69 per hour. <br />SEE ABOVE RESPONSE. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.